|
|
Address
370 St. Paul Street N.E., P.O. Box 1084
Orangeburg, South Carolina 29115 (Orangeburg Co.)
Website
http://www.williamsauction.com
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation (Main Office) Williams & Williams was formed in 1975 by Charles H. Williams and his father, Marshall B. Williams. Marshall B. Williams served in the South Carolina Senate from 1953 to 1995 and was the President Pro Tempore of the South Carolina Senate from 1989 until his death in 1995. Other distinguished members of the firm included former member Karen J. Williams who is Chief Judge of the Fourth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals. The firm has a general practice with a strong concentration in personal injury litigation, criminal defense. Statement of PracticeGeneral Practice in all Courts. Trials, Personal Injury, Criminal Defense, Workers Compensation. Firm Size: 4
Rate InformationFixed Fees Available
Free Initial Consultation
Address370 St. Paul Street N.E. P.O. Box 1084
Orangeburg, SC 29115, (Orangeburg Co.)
PhonePhone: 803-534-5218
Telefax: 803-536-6544
Websitehttp://www.williamsauction.com
Office HoursMonday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Tuesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Wednesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Thursday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Friday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Marshall B. Williams (1912-1995).
Charles H. Williams, II (Member) born Orangeburg, South Carolina, March 18, 1950; admitted to bar, 1975, South Carolina and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; 1981, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of South Carolina (B.S., 1972; J.D., 1975). Beta Gamma Sigma; Omicron Delta Epsilon. Member, Board of Trustees, South Carolina State College, 1986. Member, U.S. Civil Rights Commission for the State of South Carolina. Member: South Carolina Trial Lawyers Association; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; American Board of Trial Advocates; 4th Circuit Judicial Conference; American College of Trial Lawyers. Reported Cases: Green v. Zimmerman 238 E.E.2d 323; State v. Thrift 440 S.E.2d 341; Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel Inter. Corp. 384 S.E.2d 693; State v. Stewart 295 S.E.2d 627; Hughes v. Nelson 399 S.E.2d 24; Jones v. Way 294 S.E.2d 432; Colleton Academy v. Hoover Universal, 666S.E.2d 247. Practice Areas: Plaintiff's Civil Litigation; Automobile Accidents; Tractor Trailer Accidents; Class Actions; Construction Law; Insurance; Medical Malpractice; Negligence; Personal Injury; Products Liability; Torts; Toxic Torts; Unfair Competition; Criminal Defense; White Collar Crimes; Wills.Email: Charles H. Williams, II
C. Bradley Hutto (Member) born Orangeburg, South Carolina, August 6, 1957; admitted to bar, 1981, South Carolina. Education: University of South Carolina (B.A., magna cum laude, 1978) Phi Beta Kappa; Georgetown University (J.D., 1981). Member, South Carolina Senate, 1996. Member, 4th Circuit Judicial Conference. Member: South Carolina Trial Lawyers Association; South Carolina Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Reported Cases: Hutto Stockyard, Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture 903 F.2d 299; State v. White 325 S.E.2d 64; S.C. Dept. of Revenue v. Stardust Amusement Co. 534 S.E.2d 698. Practice Areas: Civil Litigation; Criminal Defense.Email: C. Bradley Hutto
ASSOCIATERussell A. Blanchard, IV (Associate) born Orangeburg, South Carolina, July 11, 1982; admitted to bar, 2007, South Carolina. Education: University of South Carolina (B.S., magna cum laude, 2004; J.D., 2007). Phi Beta Kappa. Practice Areas: Real Estate; Workers Compensation; Probate.Email: Russell A. Blanchard, IV
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|