|
|
Address
1533 Richland Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201 (Lexington & Richland Cos.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeBusiness and Employment Litigation; Personal Injury Litigation; Products Liability Litigation. Firm Size: 1
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Address1533 Richland Street
Columbia, SC 29201, (Lexington & Richland Cos.)
PhonePhone: 803-765-0555
Fax: 803-765-0300
Website
http://www.lawyers.com/wilmotirvin
Office HoursMonday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Tuesday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Wednesday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Thursday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Friday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Wilmot B. Irvin (Member) born Columbia, South Carolina, October 10, 1950; admitted to bar, 1977, South Carolina; 1978, U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina; 1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Education: University of South Carolina (B.A., 1972; J.D., 1977). Law Clerk to: Associate Justice George T. Gregory, Jr., South Carolina Supreme Court, 1979-1980; Hon. Robert W. Hemphill, Senior U.S. District Judge, District of South Carolina; Judge, Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1980-1981. Member, Board of Commissioners, 1985-1988 and Executive Committee, 1986-1988, on Grievances and Discipline of the South Carolina Supreme Court. Shareholder, McNair Law Firm, P.A., 1984-1987. Partner, Glenn Irvin Murphy Gray and Stepp, L.L.P., 1987-1996. Member: Richland County and American (Member, Section on Litigation) Bar Associations; South Carolina Bar; The South Carolina Bar Foundation, Inc. Reported Cases: Dickert v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 311 S.C. 218, 428 S.E.2d 700, 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 569, 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,208, 8 IER Cases 810 (S.C. 1993), as modified on grant of rehearing (1991), affirming in part and reversing in part, 306 S.C. 311, 411 S.E.2d 672 (S.C. Ct. App. 1991); Crucible Chemical Co., Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 310 S.C. 243, 423 S.E. 2d 121, 25 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1889 (S.C. Sup. Ct. 1992); Davis v. U.S. Steel Corp., 779 F. 2d 209, 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA), 955, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,796 (4th Cir. 1985); appeal after remand, Davis v. USX Corp., 819 F.2d 1270, 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas (BNA) 1685, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37, 163, 8 Fed. R. Serv. 74, 2IER Cases 1774 (4 Cir. 1987). Practice Areas: Business Litigation; Employment Litigation; Personal Injury Litigation; Products Liability Litigation; Lawsuits; Litigation.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|