|
|
Address
Shakespeare Hall
128 Dorrance Street, Suite 400
Providence, Rhode Island 02903 (Providence Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
4.4
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeEmployment Law, Discrimination, Harassment, Litigation, Corporate, Disability Insurance Claims, Federal Employment Law, ERISA and Issues, Human Resource Management, Criminal and Personal Injury, Automobile Accidents, Civil Litigation. Firm Size: 2
Catherine A. Sammartino (Member) born Hartford, Connecticut, September 8, 1964; admitted to bar, 1992, Rhode Island; 1993, Massachusetts; 1994, Connecticut. Education: Brown University (B.A., 1986); Emory University (J.D., 1992). Member: American Bar Association; Rhode Island Trial Lawyers Association. Languages: French. Practice Areas: Employment Law; Discrimination; Harassment; Litigation; Corporate Law; Disability Insurance; Federal Employment Law.Email: Catherine A. Sammartino
Andrew H. Berg (Partner) born Miami, Florida, December 25, 1966; admitted to bar, 1992, Rhode Island and U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island; 1998, Massachusetts and U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts; 2004, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut. Education: University of Florida (B.A., 1989); Emory University (J.D., 1992). Phi Beta Kappa. Former Assistant Attorney General, Rhode Island. Member: Rhode Island Bar Association; Rhode Island Trial Lawyers Association. Reported Cases: Place v. California Webbing Industries, 249 F.Supp.2d 157 (D.R.I. 2003); Russell v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car, 160 F.Supp.2d 239 (D.R.I. 2001); United States v. Grigsby, 85 F.Supp.2d 100 (D.R.I. 2000); Dep't of Corrections v. Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional Officers, 867 A.2d 823 (R.I. 2005); State v. Fillion, 785 A.2d 536 (R.I. 2001); Martin v. Howard, 784 A.2d 291 (R.I. 2001); In Re Matthew A., 743 A.2d 553 (R.I. 2000); State v. D'Agostino, 691 A.2d 561 (R.I. 1997); State v. Harrington, 689 A.2d 399 (R.I. 1997); State v. Hewes, 666 A.2d 402 (R.I. 1995); State v. Lopes, 660 A.2d 707 (R.I. 1996); State v. Bruno, 656 A.2d 948 (R.I. 1995); State v. Froais, 653 A.2d 735 (R.I. 1995); State v. Corcoran, 652 A.2d 979 (R.I. 1995); State v. Peguero, 652 A.2d 972 (R.I. 1995); State v. Cardoza, 649 A.2d 745 (R.I. 1994); State v. D'Alo, 649 A.2d 498 (R.I. 1994); State v. Mariano, 648 A.2d 803 (R.I. 1994); State v. Powers, 643 A.2d 827 (R.I. 1994); State v. Martino, 642 A.2d 679 (R.I. 1994); State v. LaChapelle, 638 A.2d 525 (R.I. 1994); State v. Flores, 637 A.2d 366 (R.I. 1994); State v. Koliscz, 636 A.2d 1329 (R.I. 1994); State v. Mercado, 635 A.2d 260 (R.I. 1993); Link v. State, 633 A.2d 1345 (R.I. 1993); In Re Paul M., 626 A.2d 694 (R.I. 1993); State v. Warner, 626 A.2d 205 (R.I. 1993); State v. Taylor, 626 A.2d 201 (R.I. 1993); State v. Lusi, 625 A.2d 1350 (R.I. 1993); State v. Taylor, 623 A.2d 453 (R.I. 1993); State v. Koliscz, 623 A.2d 452 (R.I. 1993); State v. Garcia, 622 A.2d 446 (R.I. 1993). Practice Areas: Criminal Law; Personal Injury; Appellate Practice; Business Law; Civil Rights; Discrimination; Commercial Law; Employee Benefits; Disability Benefits; ERISA.Email: Andrew H. Berg
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|