×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Juan Felipe Santos

Juan Felipe Santos

Not yet reviewed

250 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 404, San Juan, PR 00918

General Employment Litigation, Wage and Hour, Airline and Airline Service Providers and 4 more

About Juan Felipe Santos

Juan Felipe Santos is a lawyer practicing general employment litigation, wage and hour, airline and airline service providers and 4 other areas of law. Juan Felipe received a B.S. degree from Cornell University in 2000, and has been licensed for 22 years. Juan Felipe practices at Jackson Lewis P.C. in San Juan, PR.

Juan Felipe Santos (San Juan, Puerto Rico)

Reviews for Juan Felipe

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 7
    • General Employment Litigation
    • Wage and Hour
    • Airline and Airline Service Providers
    • Manufacturing
    • Hospitality
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Retail and Consumer Goods

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Office Managing Principal and Office Litigation Manager
    Firm Name
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Published Opinions: Vega-Colon v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 625 F.3d 22 (1st Cir. 2010)
    Rivera-Diaz v. Humana Health Plans of P.R., Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17573 (D.P.R. 2013)
    Velazquez v. Developers Diversified Realty, 904 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.P.R. 2012)
    Velazquez v. Developers Diversified Realty, 272 F.R.D. 310 (D.P.R. 2011)
    Hern
    ez v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.,2010 WL 4273927 (D.P.R. 2010)
    Rosado v. American Airlines, 743 F.Supp.2d 40 (D.P.R. 2010)
    Figueroa-Santiago v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 2010 WL 3724323 (TCA)
    Vega-Colon v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37133 (D.P.R. 2009)
    Baerga-Castro v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 2009 U.S. Dist LEXIS 80388 (D.P.R. 2009)
    Barron-Ruiz v. American Airlines, 2009 U.S. Dist LEXIS 93865 (D.P.R. 2009)
    Zeif, et al. v. American Airlines, 2009 WL 2351518 (TCA)
    Montalvo-Leon v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76635 (D.P.R. 2007)
    Acosta-Colon v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11240 (D.P.R. 2006)
    Torres Velez v. Brignoni, American Airlines, Inc., 2006 PR App LEXIS 2838 (TCA)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2004, Puerto Rico
    2004, U.S. District Court, District of Puerto Rico and U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional Associations and Activities

    •Federal Bar Association
    •Hispanic National Bar Association
    •National Retail Federation
    •Puerto Rico Chamber of Commerce
    •Society for Human Resource Management

    Speeches and Presentations

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Puerto Rico Law School
    Class of 2003
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Cornell University
    Class of 2000
    B.S.
    Industrial and Labor Relations
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1978
    1978

Email Juan Felipe Santos

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions