|
|
Address
424 Walnut Street, P.O. Box 142
Reading, Pennsylvania 19603-0142 (Berks Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
4.7
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeCriminal Law, Litigation, Family Law. Firm Size: 2
Address424 Walnut Street P.O. Box 142
Reading, PA 19603-0142, (Berks Co.)
PhonePhone: 877-442-9704
Fax: 610-375-1781
Website
http://www.eshlaw.net
David R. Eshelman (Member) born West Reading, Pennsylvania, August 12, 1949; admitted to bar, 1974, Pennsylvania; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit; U.S. District Court, Eastern and Middle Districts of Pennsylvania; U.S. Tax Court. Education: Dickinson College (B.A., 1971); Dickinson School of Law (J.D., 1974). Assistant Public Defender of Berks County, 1975-1978. Member: Berks County (Chairman, Criminal Law Committee, 1979, 1982, 1984, 1990, 1991), Pennsylvania and American Bar Associations; Pennsylvania Association for Justice; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; American Association for Justice; Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (Board of Directors, 1990; President, 2001-2003). Fellow: American Bar Foundation. Practice Areas: Criminal Law; White Collar Crime; Litigation; Personal Injury; Torts.Email: David R. Eshelman
Louis M. Shucker (Member) born Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July 25, 1945; admitted to bar, 1971, Pennsylvania, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania and U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Education: Temple University (B.A., 1967; J.D., 1971). Editor, Temple University Law Review, 1970. Author: "Standards for Voluntariness of Confessions," Temple Law Quarterly, 1970. Member: Berks County (Chairman, Civil Liberties Committee, 1989-1991) and Pennsylvania Bar Associations. [Corporal, U.S. Army, 1968-1974]. Practice Areas: Family Law; Children; Trusts and Estates; Probate; Wills.Email: Louis M. Shucker
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|