John A. AdamczykLinkedIn

John A. Adamczyk 0 0 reviews - Read Reviews or Write a Review
John A. Adamczyk is a Lawyer in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

412-253-2681
View Web Site
http://www.adamczyklawoffice.com

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Employment Law
  • Personal Injury

Contact Information

Currently Employed at

Adamczyk Law Offices
Partner
304 Ross Street, Suite 300,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
U.S.A.

Phone

412-253-2681 Call Now

Phone 1

412-261-5045

Fax

412-261-0884

Email

Send email to John A. Adamczyk

Website

http://www.adamczyklawoffice.com

 

Peer Rating

bv

Overall Peer Rating

4.4 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Admission Details

Admitted in 1990, Pennsylvania
1991, U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania
1994, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
1997, U.S. Supreme Court

Law School Attended

University of Dayton
Class of 1990
J.D.

University Attended

West Virginia University
Class of 1987
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in December 31,1964
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania

Representative Cases

Nymick v. Lenzer Coach Lines 632 A2d.947, Pa. Comwth. 1993, Lavia v. Comwth. of Pennsylvania, U.S. Court Of Appeals For Thw Third Circuit no. 99-3863, 2000.

Biographical Details

Pittsburgh Attorney John Adamczyk, Esquire, is a partner of Adamczyk Law Offices, L.L.P. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from West Virginia University in 1986. He received his Juris Doctorate from the University of Dayton Law School in 1990 and was... More

Office Information
John A. Adamczyk
304 Ross Street, Suite 300,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
U.S.A.
Loading...


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.