|
|
Address
One South Broad Street
Suite 1850
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-3418 (Philadelphia Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Sandals & Associates, P.C. has a practice concentrating in nationwide litigation involving employee and retiree benefits and pensions (ERISA), employment discrimination, Fair Labor Standards Act, antitrust, consumer protection, and class actions generally. Attorneys of the firm have had a leading role in many successful, precedent-setting cases in these fields on behalf of employee and consumer clients. Statement of PracticeNational practice concentrating in Complex and Class Action Litigation, Employee and Retiree Benefits and Pensions (ERISA), Employment Discrimination, Fair Labor Standards Act, Antitrust, Consumer Protection, and Trials and Appeals. Firm Size: 2
Representative Clients:Employees and Retirees of: Unisys Corp.
Campbell Soup Co.
Bell Atlantic Corp.
Consolidated Rail Corp.
Lucent Technologies, Inc.
AT&T Corp.
General Electric Co./Lockheed Martin Corp.
Xerox Corp.
3M Company
New York Life Ins. Co.
Bethlehem Steel Corp.
American Express Corp.
The Franklin Mint
Board of Education of the City of New York
Lucent Retirees Organization
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund.
AddressOne South Broad Street
Suite 1850
Philadelphia, PA 19107-3418, (Philadelphia Co.)
PhonePhone: 215-825-4000
Fax: 215-825-4001
Website
http://www.sandalslaw.com
Alan M. Sandals (Member) born Manchester, Connecticut, January 25, 1954; admitted to bar, 1980, District of Columbia; 1982, Pennsylvania. Education: Haverford College (B.A., 1976); University of Pennsylvania (J.D., cum laude, 1980). Pennsylvania Super Lawyer 2005-2007; Panelist and Lecturer: ERISA Litigation, Federal Judicial Center, 1998 and 2002; American Bar Association, 1999-2002; Pennsylvania Bar Institute, 1999, 2002-2003; LEXIS/NEXIS, 2002-2003. Member: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and American Bar Associations. Reported Cases: In re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation, 242 F.3d 497 (3rd Cir. 2001), 57 F.3d 1255 and 58 F.3d 896 (3rd Cir. 1995); Harley v. Minnesota Min. and Mfg. Co., 284 F.3d 901 (8th Cir. 2002), and 42 F.Supp.2d 898 (D. Minn. 1999); Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp., 213 F.3d 124 (3rd Cir. 2000); In re Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan Litigation, 957 F.2d 1020 (2nd Cir. 1992); Stagi v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., 407 F.Supp. 2d 671 (E.D. Pa. 2005); Saxton v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, 2003 WL 22952101, 32 EBC 1126 (E.D. Pa. 2003); Godshall v. The Franklin Mint Company, 285 F.Supp.2d 628 (E.D. Pa. 2003); Bell v. Executive Committee of United Food & Commercial Workers Pension Plan for Employees, 191 F.Supp.2d 10 (D.D.C. 2002); Mehling v. New York Life Ins. Co., 163 F.Supp.2d 502 (E.D.Pa. 2001); McHenry v. Bell Atlantic Corp., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7182 (E.D.Pa. 1999), and 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12733, 22 E.B.C. 1849 (E.D.Pa. 1998); Local 56, United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Campell Soup Co., (In re Campbell Soup Company Retiree Medical Benefits ERISA Litigation), 954 F.Supp. 1000 (D.N.J. 1997), and 898 F.Supp. 1118 (D.N.J. 1995). Practice Areas: ERISA; Pension Plans; Employee Benefits Plans; Retirement Benefit Plans; Fair Labor Standards; Consumer Protection; Complex and Multi-district Litigation; Class Actions; Antitrust.Email: Alan M. Sandals
——————————Scott M. Lempert (Associate) born Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July 24, 1966; admitted to bar, 1995, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Education: University of Delaware (B.A., magna cum laude, 1989); University of Pennsylvania (J.D., 1995). Phi Beta Kappa. 2006-2007 Pennsylvania Super Lawyers - Rising Stars Edition. Member: Philadelphia and American Bar Associations. Practice Areas: ERISA; Pension Plans; Employee Benefit Plans; Retirement Benefit Plans; Employment Discrimination; Fair Labor Standards; Consumer Protection; Complex and Multi-District Litigation; Class Actions; Antitrust.Email: Scott M. Lempert
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|