×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Alexis Peter Basilevsky

Alexis Peter Basilevsky

Not yet reviewed

Centre Square West, 1500 Market Street, Suite 3400, Philadelphia, PA 19102-2101

Litigation, Commercial Litigation, Construction Litigation and 9 more

About Alexis Peter Basilevsky

Alexis Peter Basilevsky is a lawyer practicing litigation, commercial litigation, construction litigation and 9 other areas of law. Alexis received a B.A. degree from Cornell University in 1999, and has been licensed for 24 years. Alexis practices at Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP in Philadelphia, PA.

Alexis Peter Basilevsky (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)

Reviews for Alexis

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Law 1
    • Construction Litigation
  • Insurance
  • Other 8
    • Environmental
    • Industry Focus
    • Financial Services
    • Individuals & Private Clients
    • International Businesses
    • Local Governments & Municipal Authorities
    • Real Estate Developers, Investors & REITs
    • Bankruptcy & Debt

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Reported Decisions
    Gallagher v. E. Buffalo Twp., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 432 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2014)
    Gallagher v. E. Buffalo Twp., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123626 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 29, 2013)
    Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax, Inc., No. 05-CV-2330, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2866 (D. Pa. January 14, 2010)
    Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23452 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 19, 2009)
    Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax, Inc., 651 F. Supp. 2d 378 (E.D. Pa. 2009)
    Miller v. Santilli, 2009 Phila. Ct. Com. Pl. LEXIS 207 (Pa. C.P. 2009)
    Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8970 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2008)
    Miller v. Santilli, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9531 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2008)
    Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65368 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 4, 2007)
    Miller v. Santilli, No. 06-3587, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18684 (D. Pa. March 15, 2007)
    Miller v. Santilli, 2007 Phila. Ct. Com. Pl. LEXIS 252 (Pa. C.P. 2007)
    Eagle Lake Estates, L.L.C. v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp., No. 04-169, 330 F.Supp 2d 778 (E.D. La. Aug. 11, 2004)
    Ricky's Diesel Service, Inc. v. United Diesel, L.L.C., No. 03-1132, 2003 U.S. Dist. Lexis 14318 (E.D. La. Aug. 13, 2003)
    L
    ry v. Union Planters Corp., No. 02-3617, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10553 (E.D. La. June 6, 2003)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2002, Louisiana
    2006, New Jersey
    2006, Pennsylvania
    United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
    United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
    Memberships

    Professional & Civic Activities

    American Bar Association
    Pennsylvania Bar Association
    Louisiana Bar Association
    New Orleans Bar Association
    Federal Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Tulane University
    Class of 2002
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Cornell University
    Class of 1999
    B.A.

Email Alexis Peter Basilevsky

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions