|
|
Address
1220 S.W. Morrison, Suite 815
Portland, Oregon 97205 (Clackamas, Multnomah & Washington Cos.)
Website
http://www.careylaw-firm.com
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeCivil Trial and Appellate Practice in State and Federal Courts. Personal Injury, Business, Commercial, Admiralty and Maritime, Environmental, Securities Litigation. Firm Size: 1
Address1220 S.W. Morrison, Suite 815
Portland, OR 97205, (Clackamas, Multnomah & Washington Cos.)
PhonePhone: 503-222-1415
Fax: 503-222-1923
Websitehttp://www.careylaw-firm.com
Gordon T. Carey, Jr. (Member) born McMinnville, Oregon, May 14, 1950; admitted to bar, 1975, Washington and U.S. District Court, District of Washington; 1977, Oregon, U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit and U.S. District Court, District of Oregon; 1984, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of Oregon (B.A., 1972); University of Michigan (J.D., cum laude, 1975). Phi Beta Kappa. Editor and Contributing Author: "Oregon Civil Pleading and Practice," published by Oregon State Bar. Contributing Author: "Damages;" "Evidence," published by Oregon State Bar. Member: Oregon State Bar (Member, Continuing Legal Education Committee, 1992-1995). Reported Cases: FEDERAL: Providence Health Plan v. McDowell, 361 F.3d 1243 (9th Cir. 2004), amended by 385 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 2004), cert denied 544 US 961; Stevedoring Services of America v. Ancora Transport, 506 U.S. 1043 (1993), reversing opinion at 884 F.2d 1250 (9th Cir., 1989), as modified in 941 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir., 1991); Stevedoring Services of America v. Armilla Intern., 889 F. 2d 919 (9th Cir., 1989); Marine Fuels v. M/V KEN LUCKY, 859 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir., 1988). STATE: Bailey v. Lewis Farm, Inc., 343 Or. 276, 171 P3d 336 (2007); City of Hillsboro v. Purcell, 306 Or. 547, 761 P.2d 510 (1988); Schlimgen v. May Trucking Co., 335 OR 143, 61 P3d 923 (2003), modifying opinion at 178 Or. App 397, 37 P3d 1005 (2001); Egner v. City of Portland, 103 Or. App. 623, 798 P.2d 721 (1990).
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|