|
|
Address
121 S.W. Morrison Avenue, Suite 1020
Portland, Oregon 97204 (Clackamas, Multnomah & Washington Cos.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeMental Health Issues related to Criminal Defense; Administrative Law; Appellate; Probate and Estate Planning. Firm Size: 1
Address121 S.W. Morrison Avenue, Suite 1020
Portland, OR 97204, (Clackamas, Multnomah & Washington Cos.)
PhonePhone: 503-226-0306
Fax: 503-226-4290
Harris S. Matarazzo (Member) born Portland, Oregon, July 24, 1957; admitted to bar, 1986, Oregon, U.S. District Court, District of Oregon and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1992, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: Brown University (A.B., 1979); Northwestern School of Law (J.D., 1983). Co-Author, "Mental Illness and Incapacity," in Continuing Legal Education "Criminal Law" Handbook, Oregon State Bar, 1994, 1998, 2005. Speaker, "State of Mind" Conference, Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, 1990; "Mental Health and the Law," Conference, 1995, 1996; "Mental Health and Ethical Issues in Dealing with the Mentally Ill," OLDLA Conference, 1999; Oregon Health & Sciences University Mental Health Seminar Series, 2006, 2007. Member: Multnomah County, Federal and American Bar Associations; Oregon State Bar; Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. Reported Cases: Ventris v. Maas, 781 P2d 381 (1989); Lovette v. PSRB, 795 P2d 587 (1990); Martin v. PSRB, 797 P2d 587 (1990); Bahrenfus, et al. v. Bachik, 806 P2d 170 (1991); Martin v. PSRB, 312 Or 157, 818 P2d 1264 (1991); Hodgin v. PSRB, 833 P2d 351 (1992); Garcia v. PSRB, 843 P2d 465 (1992); Strecker v. PSRB, 116 Or App 553 (1992), rev'd 120 Or App 178 (1993); Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402, 949 P2d 1194 (1991); Osborn v. PSRB, 851 P2d 1151 (1993); Strecker v. PSRB, 851 P2d 1151 (1993); Cramer v. PSRB, 857 P2d 232 (1993); Cook v. PSRB, 860 P2d 855 (1993); Stewart v. PSRB, 864 P2d 880 (1993); Hodgin v. PSRB, 873 P2d 466 (1994); Osborn v. PSRB, 898 P2d 789 (1995); Rios v. PSRB, 898 P2d 799 (1995); Drew v. PSRB, 322 Or 491, 909 P2d 211 (1996); McGowan v. PSRB, 324 Or 17, 920 P2d 153 (1996); ; State v. Bozman, 929 P2d 1019 (1996); McGowen v. PSRB, 934 P2d 609 (1997); Menzl v. PSRB, 325 Or 159, 934 P2d 431 (1997); Rios v. PSRB, 325 Or 151, 934 P2d 399 (1997); Osborn v. PSRB, 325 Or 332, 937 P2d 1028 (1997); Mueller v. PSRB, 325 Or 332, 937 P2d 1028 (1997); Einstein v. PSRB, 958 P2d 843 (1998); Strecker v. PSRB, 960 P2d 893 (1998); Hanson v. PSRB, 156 Or App 198 (1998); Beiswenger v. PSRB 970 P.2d 229 (1998); Osborn v. PSRB, 15 P.3d 80 (2000); Hanson v. PSRB, 19 P.3d 350 (2001); State v. Hedgecock, 21 P.3d 137 (2001); Rios v. PSRB, 30 P.3d 1227 (2001); Romanov v. PSRB 38 P.3d 965 (2002); Tharp v. PSRB 72 P.3d 1011 (2003); Beiswenger v. PSRB 84 P.3d 180 (2003); Laing v. PSRB 86 P.3d 100 (2004); Ashcroft v. PSRB 86 P.3d 102 (2004); Steward v. PSRB 95 P.3d 748 (2004); Tharp v. PSRB, 110 P.3d 103 (2005). Practice Areas: Administrative and Mental Health; Appellate; Business; Criminal; Probate; Estate Planning.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|