×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
James P. Silk, Jr.

James P. Silk, Jr.

Not yet reviewed

900 Adams Street, Toledo, OH 43604

Judicial Review, Public Law, Appellate Practice and 170 more

About James P. Silk, Jr.

James P. Silk, Jr. is a lawyer practicing judicial review, public law, appellate practice and 170 other areas of law. James P. received a B.A. degree from Duke University in 1990, and has been licensed for 33 years. James P. practices at Spengler Nathanson P.L.L. in Toledo, OH.

James P. Silk, Jr. (Toledo, Ohio)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

James P. Silk, Jr. got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for James P.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Education Law 1
    • School Law
  • Eminent Domain
  • Insurance 5
    • Automobile Insurance
    • Commercial Insurance
    • Fidelity and Surety
    • Insurance Bad Faith
    • Property Insurance
  • Property Damage
  • Insurance Defense
  • Leases and Leasing
  • Real Estate 3
    • Commercial Leasing
    • Landlord and Tenant Law
    • Residential Real Estate
  • Litigation 2
    • Civil Litigation
    • Complex Litigation
  • Torts 1
    • Negligence
  • Premises Liability
  • Restraining Orders
  • Other 150
    • Judicial Review
    • Public Law
    • Civil Appeals
    • Academic Employment
    • Charter School Law
    • College and University Law
    • Fraternity Liability
    • Independent School Law
    • Private Education Law
    • Public School Law
    • School Board Defense
    • School Board Liability
    • School Desegregation
    • School Equal Protection
    • School District Liability
    • School Tenure
    • Student Discipline
    • Teachers Credentials
    • Title IX Discrimination
    • Condemnation
    • Inverse Condemnation
    • Land Annexation
    • Property Rights
    • Civil Fraud
    • Fraud
    • County Government Law
    • County Liability
    • Government Affairs
    • Government Agency Practice
    • Government Immunity
    • Government Investigations
    • Government Risk Management
    • Government Tort Liability
    • Governmental Defense
    • Governmental Law
    • Governmental Liability
    • Local Government Civil Rights
    • Local Government Defense
    • Local Government Law
    • Local Government Liability
    • Local Government Relations
    • Political Subdivision Liability
    • Public Policy
    • Public Officials Liability
    • State Government Law
    • Township Law
    • Accident Insurance
    • Automobile Insurance Coverage
    • Automobile Liability
    • Casualty Insurance
    • Casualty Insurance Subrogation
    • Commercial Property Insurance
    • Excess and Reinsurance
    • Excess Coverage
    • Extra Contractual Insurance Claims
    • Fidelity and Surety Bonds
    • Fire Insurance
    • Fire Insurance Subrogation
    • Fire Loss
    • First and Third Party Insurance
    • First Party Insurance
    • General Liability
    • Indemnity
    • Insurance Adjuster Liability
    • Insurance Agents and Brokers Defense
    • Insurance Agents and Brokers Errors and Omissions
    • Insurance Agents and Brokers
    • Malpractice
    • Insurance Arbitration
    • Insurance Contracts
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Insurance Investigations
    • Insurance Litigation
    • Insurance Mediation
    • No Fault Automobile Insurance
    • Personal Liability
    • Property Insurance Coverage
    • Property Loss
    • Property Subrogation
    • Public Liability
    • Self Insured Law
    • Subrogation
    • Surety Bonds
    • Surety Law
    • Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists
    • Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists Arbitration
    • Arson and Insurance Fraud
    • Automobile Insurance Defense
    • Automobile Insurance Fraud Defense
    • Automobile Liability Defense
    • Casualty Insurance Defense
    • Commercial Insurance Defense
    • Extra Contractual Insurance Defense
    • Fire Insurance Defense
    • First and Third Party Insurance Defense
    • First Party Insurance Defense
    • Flood Insurance Defense
    • General Liability Defense
    • Insurance Bad Faith Defense
    • Insurance Coverage Defense
    • Insurance Defense Subrogation
    • Insurance Fraud Defense
    • No Fault Auto Insurance Defense
    • Personal Liability Defense
    • Property Damage Defense
    • Property Insurance Defense
    • Public Liability Defense
    • Reinsurance Defense
    • Self Insured Defense
    • Surety Defense
    • Commercial Landlord and Tenant Law
    • Industrial Leasing
    • Lease Terminations
    • Leasing
    • Office Leasing
    • Retail Leasing
    • Shopping Center Leasing
    • Unlawful Detainer
    • Defense Litigation
    • E-Discovery
    • Federal Civil Litigation
    • Federal Litigation
    • Long-Arm Litigation
    • Trial Practice
    • Municipal Civil Rights
    • Municipal Contracts
    • Municipal Corporation Law
    • Municipal Defense
    • Municipal Finance
    • Municipal Labor Law
    • Municipal Liability
    • Municipal Solid Waste
    • Municipal Solid Waste Resource Recovery
    • Municipal Taxation
    • Municipal Torts
    • Negligence Defense
    • Personal Injury Defense
    • Inadequate Security
    • Negligent Security
    • Premises Liability Defense
    • Residential Real Estate Acquisitions
    • Residential Real Estate Development
    • Residential Real Estate Finance
    • Residential Real Estate Foreclosure
    • Residential Real Estate Sales
    • Civil Liability
    • Tort Defense
    • Tort Liability
    • Land Use Litigation

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Spengler Nathanson P.L.L.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Daughenbaugh v. City of Tiffin 150 F.3d 594 (6th Cir. 1998) (summary judgment granted based on defense of qualified immunity upheld)
    Jastremski v. Safeco Insurance Co. 243 F.Supp. 743 (N.D. Ohio 2003) (served as local counsel in matter involving claim of violation of the Fair Labor St
    ard Act)
    Daimler-Chrysler v. General Motors Corporation 133 F.Supp. 2d 1041 (N.D. Ohio 2001) (served as local counsel in trademark
    unfair competition matter)
    Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Brat Automotive 2006 Ohio 4078 (9th Dist. Ct.App.) (successfully represented franchisor in contract dispute)
    Coop v. Brown 2003 Ohio 6840 (6th Dist. Ct. App.) (successfully represented insurance company in coverage dispute).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1993, Ohio
    U.S. District Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan
    Memberships
    Ohio State Bar Association
    Toledo Bar Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Michigan
    Class of 1993
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Duke University
    Class of 1990
    B.A.
    cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1968
    April 29, 1968

Email James P. Silk, Jr.

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions