×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

John Peter Hayward

Not yet reviewed

608 Madison Avenue, Toledo, OH 43604

Administrative Adjudications, Administrative Agency Practice, Administrative Hearings and Appeals and 136 more

About John Peter Hayward

John Peter Hayward is a lawyer practicing administrative adjudications, administrative agency practice, administrative hearings and appeals and 136 other areas of law. John received a B.A. degree from University of Notre Dame in 1988, and has been licensed for 31 years. John practices in Toledo, OH.

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

John Peter Hayward got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for John

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law 5
    • Administrative Adjudications
    • Administrative Agency Practice
    • Administrative Hearings and Appeals
    • Administrative Litigation
    • Judicial Review
  • Appellate Practice 2
    • Civil Appeals
    • Workers Compensation Appeals
  • Employee Benefits 1
    • Unemployment Compensation
  • Taxation 1
    • Unemployment Compensation Taxation
  • Insurance 26
    • Automobile Insurance Defense
    • Automobile Liability Defense
    • Automobile Insurance Fraud Defense
    • Casualty Insurance Defense
    • Extra Contractual Insurance Defense
    • Fire Insurance Defense
    • First and Third Party Insurance Defense
    • First Party Insurance Defense
    • Flood Insurance Defense
    • General Liability Defense
    • Insurance Bad Faith Defense
    • Insurance Coverage Defense
    • Insurance Defense Subrogation
    • Insurance Fraud Defense
    • No Fault Auto Insurance Defense
    • Personal Liability Defense
    • Property Insurance Defense
    • Public Liability Defense
    • Reinsurance Defense
    • Self Insured Defense
    • Employment Practices Liability Insurance
    • Workers Compensation Self Insurance
    • Workers Compensation Subrogation
    • No Fault Automobile Insurance
    • Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists
    • Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists Arbitration
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Commercial Insurance Defense
  • Property Damage 1
    • Property Damage Defense
  • Insurance Defense 1
    • Surety Defense
  • Labor and Employment 52
    • Americans with Disabilities Act
    • Civil Service
    • Child Labor Law
    • Collective Bargaining
    • Confidentiality Agreements
    • Covenants Not To Compete
    • Employee Discipline
    • Employee Drug Testing
    • Employee Privacy
    • Employee Rights
    • Employer Liability
    • Employer Rights
    • Employment Arbitration
    • Employment at Will
    • Employment Claims
    • Employment Class Actions
    • Employment Defense
    • Employment Law
    • Employment Litigation
    • Employment Mediation
    • Employment Rights
    • Employment Termination
    • Equal Employment Opportunity Law
    • Executive Employment Law
    • Executive Transfers
    • Fair Employment Practices
    • Family and Medical Leave Act
    • Fair Labor Standards
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Harassment
    • Human Resources Law
    • Management Employment Law
    • Management Labor Law
    • National Labor Relations Act
    • Negligent Hiring
    • Noncompete Litigation
    • Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation
    • Outsourcing
    • Personnel Policies
    • Personnel Training
    • Public Sector Employment Law
    • Reductions in Force
    • Restrictive Covenants
    • Retaliatory Discharge
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Unfair Labor Practices
    • Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
    • Wage and Hour Class Actions
    • Wage and Hour Law
    • WARN Act
    • Whistleblower Litigation
    • Workplace Violence
  • Affirmative Action
  • Civil Rights 7
    • Age Discrimination in Employment
    • Disability Discrimination
    • Employment Civil Rights
    • Employment Disability Discrimination
    • Employment Discrimination
    • National Origin Discrimination
    • Title VII Discrimination
  • Leases and Leasing 1
    • Employee Leasing
  • Torts 4
    • Employer Intentional Torts
    • Civil Liability
    • Tort Defense
    • Tort Liability
  • Contracts 3
    • Employment Breach of Contract
    • Employment Contracts
    • Executive Severance Contracts
  • Wage and Hour Law 1
    • Minimum Wage Law
  • Litigation 9
    • Civil Litigation
    • Complex Litigation
    • Defense Litigation
    • E-Discovery
    • Federal Civil Litigation
    • Federal Litigation
    • Long-Arm Litigation
    • Trial Practice
    • Asbestos Litigation
  • Personal Injury 4
    • Negligence
    • Negligence Defense
    • Industrial Accidents
    • Personal Injury Defense
  • Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) 3
    • Occupational Safety and Health
    • Occupational Injuries
    • OSHA
  • Real Estate 4
    • Residential Real Estate
    • Residential Real Estate Acquisitions
    • Residential Real Estate Development
    • Residential Real Estate Sales
  • Finance 1
    • Residential Real Estate Finance
  • Toxic Torts 1
    • Asbestos Defense
  • Workers Compensation 3
    • Workers Compensation Arbitration
    • Workers Compensation Defense
    • Workers Compensation Mediation
  • Debtor and Creditor 1
    • Debt Collection
  • Other 2
    • Agreements
    • Defective and Dangerous Products

Practice Details

  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Travelers Casualty
    Surety Co. v. Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc., Lucas County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 03-4077 (products & premises liability insurance coverage dispute)
    Smith v. R. G. Zachrich Construction, Inc., 2003 WL 21262759 (3rd Dist. Ct. App. 2003) (construction contract dispute)
    Bianchi v. Moore, 2001 WL 34069321 (6th Dist. Ct. App. 2001) (errors
    omissions)
    Bonacker v. H. J. Heinz Company, 111 Ohio App.3d 569 (6th Dist. Ct. App. 1996) (products liability).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1995, Ohio
    1996, Michigan
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
    Memberships
    Ohio State Bar Association
    Michigan Bar Association
    Toledo Bar Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Toledo
    Class of 1995
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Notre Dame
    Class of 1988
    B.A.
    Economics
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1966
    Toledo, Ohio, April 2, 1966

John Peter Hayward

Not yet reviewed

608 Madison AvenueToledo, OH 43604U.S.A.

Show on map

Email John Peter Hayward

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions