×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Anastasia Kay Hanson

Not yet reviewed

608 Madison Avenue, Toledo, OH 43604

General Liability Defense, Public Liability Defense, Commercial Insurance Defense and 57 more

About Anastasia Kay Hanson

Anastasia Kay Hanson is a lawyer practicing general liability defense, public liability defense, commercial insurance defense and 57 other areas of law. Anastasia received a B.A. degree from University of Toledo in 1978, and has been licensed for 26 years. Anastasia practices in Toledo, OH.

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Anastasia

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Insurance 3
    • General Liability Defense
    • Public Liability Defense
    • Employment Practices Liability Insurance
  • Commercial Law 2
    • Commercial Insurance Defense
    • Commercial Collections
  • Civil Rights 10
    • Age Discrimination in Employment
    • Disability Discrimination
    • Employment Civil Rights
    • Employment Disability Discrimination
    • National Origin Discrimination
    • Title VII Discrimination
    • Civil Rights Section 1983
    • Discrimination
    • Race Discrimination
    • Sex Discrimination
  • Labor and Employment 37
    • Americans with Disabilities Act
    • Confidentiality Agreements
    • Covenants Not To Compete
    • Employee Discipline
    • Employee Drug Testing
    • Employee Privacy
    • Employer Liability
    • Employer Rights
    • Employment at Will
    • Employment Defense
    • Employment Claims
    • Employment Law
    • Employment Litigation
    • Employment Rights
    • Equal Employment Opportunity Law
    • Fair Employment Practices
    • Fair Labor Standards
    • Family and Medical Leave Act
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Harassment
    • Human Resources Law
    • Noncompete Litigation
    • Negligent Hiring
    • Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation
    • Personnel Policies
    • Personnel Training
    • Public Sector Employment Law
    • Reductions in Force
    • Restrictive Covenants
    • Retaliatory Discharge
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
    • Wage and Hour Law
    • WARN Act
    • Whistleblower Litigation
    • Wrongful Termination
    • Wrongful Termination Defense
  • Torts 1
    • Employer Intentional Torts
  • Contracts 2
    • Employment Breach of Contract
    • Employment Contracts
  • Appellate Practice 1
    • Civil Appeals
  • Workers Compensation 1
    • Workers' Compensation Law
  • Regulatory Law 1
    • Administrative Law/Regulatory Law
  • Other 1
    • Agreements

Practice Details

  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Patrick Kilbane v. Huron County Commissioners, N.D.Ohio No. 3:10CV2751, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115067 (Oct. 5, 2011) (granting summary judgment to defendant sheriff on pro se plaintiff's Section 1983 claim arising from alleged violations of First Amendment right of “access to the courts”).

    Paul Myers v. Hensley, et al., N.D.Ohio No. 3:07CV01529, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93385 (Sept. 8, 2010) (adopting magistrate judge's report
    recommendation
    granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claims of violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, selective enforcement, malicious prosecution,
    intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from alleged improper prosecution).
    American Maritime Officers v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, District No. 1, et al., 2007 Fed.App. 0394P, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22819 (6th Cir.) (addressing the post-removal-event doctrine
    dismissing defendants' appeal of a district court rem
    order where the plaintiff's complaint set forth only state law claims).
    City of Perrysburg v. Toledo Edison, 171 Ohio App. 3d 174 (6th Dist. 2007) (holding that a utility had no right to reimbursement of its equipment relocation expenses where the equipment was located in private easements subject to an existing highway right-of-way).
    Rosemary Johnson-Kurek v. Samir Abu-Absi, et al., 423 F.3d 590, 2005 U.S. App.LEXIS 1966 (6th Cir.) (holding that a university did not violate a professor's free speech rights
    , therefore, plaintiff failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 where the university gave directions to the professor regarding her communication with students).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2000, Ohio
    2001, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Ohio
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Michigan
    Memberships
    Chair, Toledo Bar Association's Labor & Employment Law Committee Sunset Retirement Communities, Board Member, 2013-15

    Toledo Area Small Business Association, Board of Directors 2011-14

    Toledo Women’s Bar Association, Program Planning Committee 2012-13, 2013-14

    Toledo Chamber of Commerce, Member, Workplace Regulations Committee

    Ohio State Bar Association, Committee Member Labor and Employment Law Section Member

    Toledo Area Human Resource Association, Member

    Society for Human Resource Management, Member

    Planned Parenthood of Northwestern Ohio, 2006-2010
    Leadership Council Member, 2009-2010
    Leadership Council Chair

    2011 Lucas County Bar Association (Executive Committee 2005, 2007)
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Toledo, College of Law
    Class of 2000
    J.D.
    magna cum laude

    University of Toledo, College of Law
    Class of 2000
    J.D.
    2000 Order of the Coif

    University of Toledo, College of Law
    Class of 2000
    J.D.
    Law Review
    Other Education
    University of Toledo
    Class of 1978
    B.A.

    University of Toledo
    Class of 1980
    M.P.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Hobbies & Interests
    Golf, cooking, baking, traveling

Anastasia Kay Hanson

Not yet reviewed

608 Madison AvenueToledo, OH 43604U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Joseph William Westmeyer III
Pro
Joseph William Westmeyer III
3.7
11
Insurance lawyer

Free Consultation

567-326-5309
View Profile
Paulette Balin
Pro
Paulette Balin
4.0
23
Insurance lawyer

Free Consultation

440-445-4219
View Profile
Charles Edward Boyk
Pro
Charles Edward Boyk
4.9
112
Insurance lawyer

Free Consultation

567-702-6776
View Profile
Joseph Carmen Patituce
Pro
Joseph Carmen Patituce
4.8
127
Insurance lawyer

Free Consultation

440-737-2007
View Profile
John Stephen Wasung
Pro
John Stephen Wasung
4.6
14
Insurance lawyer
CallView Phone
View Profile

Email Anastasia Kay Hanson

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions