|
|
Address
Landerbrook Corporate Center
5910 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 200
Cleveland, Ohio 44124-6500 (Cuyahoga Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation  Accepts Credit Cards (Main Office) Statement of PracticeCriminal Defense, Trial and Appellate Practice, State and Federal Courts, White Collar Defense, Health Care Fraud, Antitrust Defense, Regulatory Investigations, Tax Fraud, Complex Civil Fraud, Attorney Discipline, Legal Malpractice Defense. Firm Size: 2
Rate InformationFree Initial Consultation
Accepts Major Credit Cards - Visa
- MasterCard
- American Express
AddressLanderbrook Corporate Center
5910 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 200
Cleveland, OH 44124-6500, (Cuyahoga Co.)
PhonePhone: 440-544-2000
Fax: 440-544-2002
Website
http://www.hennenberg.com
Office HoursMonday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Tuesday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Wednesday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Thursday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Friday: 09:00 AM - 01:00 PM
Michael C. Hennenberg born September 23, 1948; admitted to bar, 1974, Ohio and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio; 1977, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit; 1978, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. District Court. Southern District of Ohio; 2004. Education: The Ohio State University (B.S., Business Administration, 1970); Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland State University (J.D., 1974). Certified as a Criminal Trial Advocacy Specialist by the National Board of Trial Advocacy. Certified by the Ohio Supreme Court Committee on the Appointment of Counsel for Indigent Defendant's in Capital Cases. Author: "An Analysis of R.C. 2951.041 - Drug Treatment In Lieu of Conviction," Vol. 1, Issue 5 Criminal Law Journal of Ohio; "Conducting a Defense Jury Voir Dire Through the Judge in Federal District Court". Co-Authored, with Mark R. DeVan: "The Champion," Official Publication of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Vol. II, No. 2, March 1987. Lecturer: "A Practitioner's Guide to Professionalism, Ethics and Substance Abuse," Lorman Education Services, 2000-2004, "Plea Negotiations, " The Ohio State Bar Association CLE Institute, 2000; "Litigation Essentials: Talking to the Jury," Cleveland Marshall Law Alumni Association, 1996; "Pleading and Practice in White Collar Cases," Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyer's Defense of White Collar Criminal Cases, 1992. Member: Cleveland Bar Association (Member: Board of Trustees, 1985-1988; Criminal Law Committee; Past Chairman, 1981-1982; Criminal Law Committee, 1974; Legislative Liaison, 1983-1986; Steering Committee of Task Force on Violent Crime; Co-Chairman, Robbery Sub Task Force, 1982); National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys (Charter Member, Board of Directors, 1986); Ohio State and American Bar Associations. American Board of Criminal Lawyers. Reported Cases: Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Robert Garfield, 109 Ohio St. 3d 103 (Supreme Court of Ohio 2006); Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Donald Ezzone, 102 Ohio St. 3d 79 (Supreme Court of Ohio 2004); James Samuel Sims v. Ted Engle, 619 F.2d 598 (United States Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, 1980) cert. denied, 67 L.Ed.2d 374 (United States Supreme Court, 1981); Pepper Pike v. Doe, 66 Ohio St. 2d 374 (Supreme Court of Ohio, 1981); State of Ohio v. Thomas Pearson, 62 Ohio St. 2d 291 (Supreme Court of Ohio, 1980); State of Ohio v. Lee, et. al., 48 Ohio St.2d 208 (Supreme Court of Ohio, 1976); State of Ohio v. Robert Cornell, 72 OOp.2d 428 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1975). Practice Areas: Criminal Defense; Trial and Appellate Practice; State and Federal Courts; White Collar Defense; Health Care Fraud; Antitrust Defense; Regulatory Investigations; Tax Fraud; Complex Civil Fraud; Attorney Discipline; Legal Malpractice Defense.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|