Jack W. AbelLinkedIn

Jack W. Abel 5.0 reviews - Read Reviews or Write a Review
Jack W. Abel is a Lawyer in Cleveland, Ohio

216-592-8745
View Web Site
http://www.abelandzocolo.com

Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Interstate Child Custody
  • International Child Custody
  • Sports Law
  • Domestic Violence
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Divorce Taxation
  • Probate
  • Guardianship

Contact Information

Currently Employed at

Abel & Zocolo Co., LPA
Managing Partner
The Superior Building - Suite 1915 815 Superior Avenue,
Cleveland, OH 44114
U.S.A.

Phone

216-592-8745

Phone 1

216-621-6138

Fax

216-241-5620

Email

Send email to Jack W. Abel

Website

http://www.abelandzocolo.com

 

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law, Real Estate and Trusts and Estates
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 06/30/10
Posted by a Consumer on 06/30/10
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Life can throw difficult, sometimes unexpected serious events very suddenly at you. Be it a marriage ending, health problems, financial dilemmas, etc. you seek out the best professional capable person you can to help find some sort of solution for whatever it is. Jack Abel was just that person for my situation. I have the utmost respect and gratitude to him and his staff for their handling of my particular case.
Posted by a Consumer on 06/30/10
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
My husband and I have had the pleasure of working with Jack Abel for several years. Jack is compassionate but plays hardball in the courtroom. He is very professional and is well liked by his peers. He is also reasonable. Jack worked with me on the terms of my divorce from my former husband and made sure I was given a good settlement. I am happy to say that I was able to keep my house and my son with me. I really appreciated all the help and guidance Jack afforded me. Highly recommended.

Experience & Credentials

Admission Details

Admitted in 1974, Ohio and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
1984, U.S. Supreme Court

Payment Information
  • Accepts Other - Free 10 minute initial consultation by phone
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
Law School Attended

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Class of 1974
J.D.

University Attended

The Ohio State University
Class of 1970
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in June 1,1948
Cleveland
Ohio

Associations & Memberships

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association (Member and Former Chairman, Family Law Section).

Representative Cases

Pasqualone v. Pasqualone, 63 Ohio St 2d 96, 406 N.E. 22 1121 (Ohio 1980); Strother v. Hutchinson, 67 Ohio St 2d 282, 423 N.E. 2d 467 (Ohio 1981); Mayor v. Mayor, 71 Ohio App 3d 789, 595 N.E. 2d 436 (Ohio App. 8 Dist, 1991); State v. Steiner, 2002 Ohio 4019; 2002 Ohio App. LEXIS 424; Ameritrust Co. vs. Wright, 1983 Ohio App. LEXIS 12750; Sgro v. McDonald's Restaurant, 21 Ohio App. 3d 41, 486 N.E.2d 157 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. 1984); McHenry v. McHenry, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 6065; Hill v. McClendon, 2001 Ohio 4128, 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 655; Schwartz v. Schwartz, 8 Ohio App. 3d 311, 456 N.E.2d 1272 (Ohio App. 11 Dist. 1982); Thacker v. Thacker, 74 Ohio App. 3d 348, 598 N.E.2d 1183 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. 1991); Gray v. Gray, 1994 Ohio App. LEXIS 5482, 1994 WL 695328; Sullivan v. Whitten, 2000 Ohio App Lexis 3813, (2000); Harding v. Harding, 2005 Ohio 3010 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005); Sandorf v. Sandorf, 190 Ohio App 3d 355, 941 N.E. 2d 1248 (Ohio App. 8 Dist, 2010).

Biographical Details

Court Appointed Arbitrator, Court Appointed Guardian Ad Litem. Mentor, Ohio Supreme Court Lawyer to Lawyer Mentoring Program.

Office Information
Jack W. Abel
The Superior Building - Suite 1915 815 Superior Avenue,
Cleveland, OH 44114
U.S.A.
Loading...

Abel and Zocolo Co LPA
Abel & Zocolo Co., LPA (Cleveland, Ohio)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.