×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Daniel Roger Murphy

Not yet reviewed

4th and Broadalbin St., Courthouse, Po Box 1749, Albany, OR 97321-0491

About Daniel Roger Murphy

Daniel Roger Murphy is a lawyer. Daniel received a B.A. degree from University of Vermont in 1996, and has been licensed for 34 years. Daniel practices in Albany, OR.

Reviews for Daniel

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Cir.J.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2004, California
    2005, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    2006, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    1992, New York
    Not admitted in OR
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California at Berkeley
    Class of 2003
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Vermont
    Class of 1996
    B.A.
    Environmental Studies

    University of Vermont
    Class of 1996
    B.A.
    magna cum laude

    University of Vermont
    Class of 1996
    B.A.
    Phi Beta Kappa
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1973
    New York, New York, July 11, 1973

Daniel Roger Murphy

Cir.J.
Not yet reviewed

4th and Broadalbin St., CourthousePo Box 1749Albany, OR 97321-0491U.S.A.

Show on map
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions