×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Matthew Naparty
Pro

Matthew Naparty

Not yet reviewed

100 Crossways Park Drive West, Suite 310, Woodbury, NY 11797 + 1 location

Appellate Practice

About Matthew Naparty

Matthew Naparty is an owner and managing partner of Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP. He is routinely called upon for his appellate expertise in high-exposure and complex cases by major insurance companies, corporations, hospitals, individuals and other attorneys. Since joining MLN in 2001, he has handled hundreds of significant motions and appeals in State and Federal Courts and is noted for several important decisions in the areas of medical malpractice, labor law and premises liability, including Beato v. Cosmopolitan Associates, LLC (2010) (limiting landowners liability for attack on premises and setting aside $6.75 million verdict and dismissing complaint); Cohen v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 11 N.Y.3d 823 (2008)(limiting liability under Scaffold Law); Elias v. Bash (2008) (limiting duty owed by consulting physicians); Miraglia v. H&L Holding Corp. (2007) ($75 million pain and suffering award ultimately reduced to $10 million); and Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc., 98 N.Y.2d 136 (2002) (defining and limiting scope of snow removal contractor’s liability). Mr. Naparty also submitted an amicus curaie brief to the New York Court of Appeals on behalf of a Suffolk County Legislator in the landmark case Skelos v. Paterson (holding that Governor Paterson had authority to fill vacancy in office of Lieutenant-Governor by appointment). In addition to briefing and arguing appeals, Mr. Naparty chairs the firm’s Active Trial Monitoring Program where, unlike other monitoring counsel, MLN actively “partners” with and assists trial counsel in developing the overall trial strategy, preserving the record, making motions and providing an objective appellate perspective. Prior to joining MLN, Mr. Naparty worked in various capacities for the New York State Appellate Division, Second Department. He has published on various topics relating to his practice and frequently educates industry professionals through lectures and seminars. In 2011, Mr. Naparty received Long Island Business News’ coveted “40 Under 40” award, the publication’s annual salute to 40 professionally rising individuals under the age of 40. He was selected by Super Lawyers for inclusion on the 2011 New York Rising Stars list. And he is an appointed member of the New York State Bar Association’s Committee on Courts of Appellate Jurisdiction. Mr. Naparty earned his Juris Doctorate, dean’s list, from St. John’s University and his Bachelor of Science from Brooklyn College.

 

Matthew Naparty (Woodbury, New York) View website

Reviews for Matthew

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Other
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Principal
    Firm Name
    Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Ayoub v. Ayoub, --- N.E.2d ----, 2010 WL 2360607, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 05247, N.Y., June 15, 2010(No. 165 SSM 11)
    Gal-Ed v. 153rd Street Associates, LLC, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 73 A.D.3d 438, 2010 WL 1753340, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 03790, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., May 04, 2010
    Valentin v. City of New York, 73 A.D.3d 755, 899 N.Y.S.2d 651, 2010 WL 1794128, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 03911, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., May 04, 2010
    Ashjian v. Orion Power Holdings, Inc., 70 A.D.3d 738, 895 N.Y.S.2d 459, 2010 WL 437863, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 00911, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., February 09, 2010
    French v. Schiavo, 70 A.D.3d 403, 892 N.Y.S.2d 762, 2010 WL 346248, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 00719, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., February 02, 2010
    Awon v. Harran Transp. Co., Inc., 69 A.D.3d 889, 895 N.Y.S.2d 135, 2010 WL 323495, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 00638, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., January 26, 2010
    Beato v. Cosmopolitan Associates, LLC, 69 A.D.3d 774, 893 N.Y.S.2d 578, 2010 WL 191740, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 00458, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., January 19, 2010
    Samuel v. Samuel, 69 A.D.3d 835, 893 N.Y.S.2d 250, 2010 WL 198524, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 00500, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., January 19, 2010
    Miraglia v. H & L Holding Corp., 67 A.D.3d 513, 892 N.Y.S.2d 2, 2009 WL 3818215, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 08453, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., November 17, 2009
    Osowski v. AMEC Const. Management, Inc., 69 A.D.3d 99, 887 N.Y.S.2d 11, 2009 WL 3200042, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 07208, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., October 08, 2009
    Yanovsky v. 833 Flatbush, LLC, 66 A.D.3d 669, 885 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2009 WL 3207185, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 07247, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., October 06, 2009
    Skelos v. Paterson, 13 N.Y.3d 141, 915 N.E.2d 1141, 886 N.Y.S.2d 846, 2009 WL 2997072, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 06585, N.Y., September 22, 2009
    Ayoub v. Ayoub, 63 A.D.3d 493, 881 N.Y.S.2d 66, 2009 WL 1635539, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 04745, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., June 11, 2009
    Fuchs v. Austin Mall Associates, LLC, 62 A.D.3d 746, 879 N.Y.S.2d 166, 2009 WL 1350763, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 03863, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., May 12, 2009
    Sitar v. Sitar, 61 A.D.3d 739, 878 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2009 WL 1014453, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 02984, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., April 14, 2009
    Gulati v. Gulati, 60 A.D.3d 810, 876 N.Y.S.2d 430, 2009 WL 711381, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 01948, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., March 17, 2009
    Chernysheva v. Pinchuck, 57 A.D.3d 936, 871 N.Y.S.2d 621, 2008 WL 5413719, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 10577, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., December 30, 2008
    Cohen v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 11 N.Y.3d 823, 897 N.E.2d 1059, 868 N.Y.S.2d 578, 2008 WL 4700793, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 08161, N.Y., October 28, 2008
    Kucevic v. Three Park Ave. Bldg. Co., L.P., 55 A.D.3d 792, 866 N.Y.S.2d 314, 2008 WL 4682533, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 08095, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., October 21, 2008
    Steinberg v. Novitt & Sahr, 54 A.D.3d 1043, 863 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2008 WL 4427956, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 07249, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., September 30, 2008
    Elias v. Bash, 54 A.D.3d 354, 863 N.Y.S.2d 73, 2008 WL 3411214, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 06587, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., August 12, 2008
    Sitar v. Sitar, 50 A.D.3d 667, 854 N.Y.S.2d 536, 2008 WL 879430, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 02990, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., April 01, 2008
    Nasuro v. PI Associates, LLC, 49 A.D.3d 829, 858 N.Y.S.2d 175, 2008 WL 806321, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 02804, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., March 25, 2008
    Miraglia v. H & L Holding Corp., 17 Misc.3d 852, 847 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2007 WL 3087381, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 27434, N.Y.Sup., September 28, 2007
    Manuka v. Crenshaw, 43 A.D.3d 886, 841 N.Y.S.2d 782, 2007 WL 2669837, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 06647, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., September 11, 2007
    Pippo v. City of New York, 43 A.D.3d 303, 842 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2007 WL 2264611, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 06409, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., August 09, 2007
    Jordan v. City of New York, 38 A.D.3d 336, 833 N.Y.S.2d 8, 2007 WL 819068, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 02412, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., March 20, 2007
    Pierre v. Lieber, 37 A.D.3d 572, 829 N.Y.S.2d 665, 2007 WL 465755, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 01277, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., February 13, 2007
    Miraglia v. H & L Holding Corp., 36 A.D.3d 456, 828 N.Y.S.2d 329, 2007 WL 45982, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 00093, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., January 09, 2007
    Allison v. Erie County Indus. Development Agency, 35 A.D.3d 1159, 829 N.Y.S.2d 294, 2006 WL 3759329, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 09736, N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept., December 22, 2006
    Rutherford v. Erie County Indus. Development Agency, 35 A.D.3d 1161, 825 N.Y.S.2d 401, 2006 WL 3759339, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 09737, N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept., December 22, 2006
    Arons v. Jutkowitz, 37 A.D.3d 94, 825 N.Y.S.2d 738, 2006 WL 3530126, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 09139, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., December 05, 2006
    Sherman v. DeRosa, 34 A.D.3d 782, 825 N.Y.S.2d 525, 2006 WL 3437994, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 08963, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., November 28, 2006
    Caruso v. John Street Fitness Club, LLC, 34 A.D.3d 296, 824 N.Y.S.2d 255, 2006 WL 3290431, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 17,607, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 08180, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., November 14, 2006
    Serby v. Long Isl
    Jewish Medical Center, 34 A.D.3d 441, 824 N.Y.S.2d 119, 2006 WL 3232151, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 08106, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., November 08, 2006
    Gonzalo v. Joline Estates Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., 29 A.D.3d 631, 815 N.Y.S.2d 181, 2006 WL 1304693, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 03724, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., May 09, 2006
    O'Neill v. Ho, 28 A.D.3d 626, 814 N.Y.S.2d 202, 2006 WL 1010504, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 02863, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., April 18, 2006
    Parkin v. Ederer, 27 A.D.3d 633, 810 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2006 WL 710739, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 02180, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., March 21, 2006
    Mendez v. Union Theological Seminary in City of New York, 26 A.D.3d 260, 809 N.Y.S.2d 77, 2006 WL 389726, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 01262, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., February 21, 2006
    Gonzalez v. Jamaica Hosp., 25 A.D.3d 652, 807 N.Y.S.2d 316, 2006 WL 205040, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 00477, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., January 24, 2006
    Lindsey v. H.B. Associates, L.L.C., 24 A.D.3d 274, 809 N.Y.S.2d 2, 2005 WL 3489645, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 10033, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., December 22, 2005
    Dubi v. Jericho Fire Dist., 22 A.D.3d 631, 803 N.Y.S.2d 103, 2005 WL 2659397, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 07656, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., October 17, 2005
    Braham v. Country Life Realty Co., 9 Misc.3d 88, 801 N.Y.S.2d 110, 2005 WL 2276408, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 25386, N.Y.Sup.App.Term, September 16, 2005
    Batal v. Associated Universities, Inc., 18 A.D.3d 484, 795 N.Y.S.2d 268, 2005 WL 1106093, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 03797, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., May 09, 2005
    Mendez v. Union Theological Seminary in City of New York, 17 A.D.3d 271, 793 N.Y.S.2d 420, 2005 WL 949032, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 03170, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., April 26, 2005
    Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc., 16 A.D.3d 228, 790 N.Y.S.2d 604, 2005 WL 612871, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 01993, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., March 17, 2005
    Manswell v. St. Luke's Hosp., 16 A.D.3d 182, 792 N.Y.S.2d 389, 2005 WL 552452, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 01801, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., March 10, 2005
    Lewis v. Port Authority of New York
    New Jersey, 8 A.D.3d 205, 779 N.Y.S.2d 479, 2004 WL 1444702, 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 05569, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., June 29, 2004
    Sanna v. Rim, Inc., 8 A.D.3d 649, 779 N.Y.S.2d 554, 2004 WL 1468965, 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 05635, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., June 28, 2004
    Sanna v. Rim, Inc., 8 A.D.3d 648, 779 N.Y.S.2d 253, 2004 WL 1468983, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 17,050, 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 05634, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., June 28, 2004
    Mendez v. Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York, 8 A.D.3d 32, 777 N.Y.S.2d 636, 2004 WL 1211504, 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 04423, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., June 03, 2004
    Thruway Investments v. O'Connell & Aronowitz, P.C., 3 A.D.3d 674, 772 N.Y.S.2d 716, 2003 WL 23163100, 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 00171, N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept., January 15, 2004
    Caruso v. Inhilco, Inc., 2 A.D.3d 662, 768 N.Y.S.2d 639, 2003 WL 23009978, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 19696, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., December 22, 2003
    Sawtelle v. Southside Hosp., 305 A.D.2d 659, 760 N.Y.S.2d 206, 2003 WL 21221806, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 14523, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., May 27, 2003
    Maniscalco v. Liro Engineering Const. Management, P.C., 305 A.D.2d 378, 759 N.Y.S.2d 163, 2002 WL 32087585, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 13842, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., May 05, 2003
    Durant v. Brooklyn Medical Group, P.C., 303 A.D.2d 444, 755 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2002 WL 32058361, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 11847, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., March 10, 2003
    McKenna v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc., 302 A.D.2d 329, 756 N.Y.S.2d 181, 2003 WL 549924, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 11477, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., February 27, 2003
    Heller v. Louis Provenzano, Inc., 303 A.D.2d 20, 756 N.Y.S.2d 26, 2003 WL 462394, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 11412, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., February 25, 2003
    Amo v. Little Rapids Corp., 301 A.D.2d 698, 754 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2002 WL 31898212, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op. 10022, N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept., January 02, 2003
    Sithian v. Spence, 300 A.D.2d 387, 750 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2002 WL 31758721, 2002 N.Y. Slip Op. 09238, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., December 09, 2002
    Salmon v. Rockefeller Center Management Corp., 299 A.D.2d 297, 750 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2002 WL 31656574, 2002 N.Y. Slip Op. 08826, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., November 26, 2002
    Brzuswski v. 69-70 Associates, 299 A.D.2d 443, 749 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2002 WL 31598000, 2002 N.Y. Slip Op. 08589, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., November 18, 2002
    Paniccia v. Long Isl
    Rail Road Co., 297 A.D.2d 366, 746 N.Y.S.2d 607, 2002 WL 1977880, 2002 N.Y. Slip Op. 06265, N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., August 26, 2002
    Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc., 98 N.Y.2d 136, 773 N.E.2d 485, 746 N.Y.S.2d 120, 2002 WL 1162862, 2002 N.Y. Slip Op. 04465, N.Y., June 04, 2002
    Caldwell v. Party Rental Ltd., 293 A.D.2d 407, 740 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2002 WL 724792, 2002 N.Y. Slip Op. 03283, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept., April 25, 2002.
  • Additional Links
    http://www.mlnappeals.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2001, New Jersey
    2002, New York
    2006, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    2006, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court
    2001, U.S. District Court District of New Jersey
    Memberships
    Appointed Member, NYSBA Committee on Courts of Appellate Jurisdiction.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    St. John's University School of Law
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Brooklyn College of the City University of New York
    B.S.

Contact Matthew Naparty

Principal at Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP
Not yet reviewed

100 Crossways Park Drive West, Suite 310Woodbury, NY 11797U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 516-487-5811

100 Crossways Park Drive W, Suite 310New York, NY 10119U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 516-487-5811
Office Hours:
  • Monday 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Tuesday 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Wednesday 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Thursday 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Friday 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
view 1 other office Location
hide 1 other office Location

Other Office Location

New York, NY

100 Crossways Park Drive W, Suite 310New York, NY 10119U.S.A.

Show on map

Activity

Email Matthew Naparty

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Matthew Naparty is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, Matthew Naparty has a professional profile on LinkedIn.
  • Does this attorney accept major credit cards?
    Yes, Matthew Naparty will accept MasterCard and Visa.
  • Does this attorney maintain a practice in more than one location?
    Yes, Matthew Naparty has a presence in New York, NY.
  • Is this attorney listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers?
    Matthew Naparty is listed in the Appellate Practice section of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions