|
|
Address
80 Scenic Drive, Suite 5
Freehold, New Jersey 07728 (Monmouth Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticePatents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Unfair Competition and Related Intellectual Property Matters. Trials and Appeals in State and Federal Courts. Firm Size: 2
Lawrence D. Mandel (Member) born New York, N.Y., March 29, 1953; admitted to bar, 1989, Pennsylvania and New Jersey; 1992 New York, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, U.S. District Court, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal and Second Circuits. Education: University of Connecticut (B.S., 1976); Berklee College of Music (Professional Diploma in Film Scoring, cum laude, 1981); Rutgers University (J.D., with honors, 1989). Order of the Coif. Articles Editor, Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal, 1988-1989. Author: "Digital Communications Associates, Inc. v. Softklone Distributing Corporation: Copyright Protection for the Status Screen of A Computer Program," Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1989. Member: American Bar Association (Member, Section of Patent, Trademark and Copyright Law; Forum on Entertainment and Sports Industries). (Also Of Counsel at Klauber & Jackson, Hackensack, New Jersey). Reported Cases: Tufenkian Import/Export Ventures v. Einstein-Moomjy, 338 F.3d 127 (2d Cir. 2003). Practice Areas: Intellectual Property Litigation; Trademark Prosecution; Copyright Prosecution; Franchises and Franchising; Trademark Licensing; Employment Litigation; Copyright Licensing; Entertainment Law; Commercial Transactions; Right of Publicity; Trade Secrets; International Trademarks; Trade Dress; Trademark Litigation; Copyright Litigation; False Advertising; Business Torts; Internet Trademark Law; Software Copyright.Email: Lawrence D. Mandel
Arthur M. Peslak (Member) born Newark, New Jersey, September 8, 1956; admitted to bar, 1989, New Jersey; 1990, New York and U.S. District Court, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, District of New Jersey and U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal, Second and Third Circuits; registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Education: Rutgers University (B.S., with honors, 1978, Mechanical Engineering; M.S., 1982; J.D., with honors, 1989). Order of Coif. Editor, Rutgers Law Review, 1988-1989. Member: Monmouth County, New Jersey State (Chair, Intellectual Property Section, 1997-1999) and American Bar Associations; New Jersey Intellectual Property Law Association; New York Intellectual Property Law Association. Reported Cases: Door-Master Corp. v. Yorktowne, Inc., 256 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Practice Areas: Intellectual Property Litigation; Patent Prosecution; Patent Licensing; Franchises and Franchising; Employment Litigation; Labor Law; Patent Litigation; Trademark Litigation; Copyright Litigation; Trademark Licensing; Copyright Licensing; False Advertising; Business Torts; Trade Secrets; Trade Dress; Right of Publicity; Trademark Prosecution; Copyright Prosecution.Email: Arthur M. Peslak
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|