|
|
Address
150 Ridge Street, 2nd Floor
Reno, Nevada 89501 (Washoe Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
4.4
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation (Main Office) Richard F. Cornell is among Nevada's regular appellate litigators in the areas of criminal and domestic relations law. He also has successfully litigated a number of post-conviction habeas corpus writ petitions. The website on Lawyers.com contains more details regarding specific cases. Statement of PracticeCriminal Law, Family Law, Appellate Litigation and Criminal Appeals. Year Established: 1986
Firm Size: 1
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Free Initial Consultation
Address150 Ridge Street, 2nd Floor
Reno, NV 89501, (Washoe Co.)
PhonePhone: 775-329-1141
Fax: 775-329-7651
URL: http://www.lawyers.com/rickcornell
Website
http://www.rfcornellaw.com
Office HoursMonday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Tuesday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Wednesday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Thursday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Friday: 08:30 AM - 05:00 PM
Richard F. Cornell (Member) born Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 9, 1952; admitted to bar, 1977, California; 1979, Nevada. Education: University of California at Irvine (A.B., 1974); University of San Francisco (J.D., 1977). Law Clerk to Chief Judge, United States District Court of Nevada, 1978-1980. Co-Editor, Nevada, Civil Practice Manual, 1985. Lecturer, "Child Custody and Visitation in Nevada," NBI, 1994; 1996; 1998. Family Law Litigation in Nevada, NBI, 1994. Pro Tem Judge, Reno Justice Court, 1992. Member: State Bar of California; State Bar of Nevada (Member, Fee Dispute Committee); American Bar Association; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Nevada Trial Lawyers Association. Reported Cases: United States v. Ligon, 440 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2006); Williams v. Williams, 120 Nev. 559 P.3d 1124 (2004); Batin v. State, 118 Nev. 61, 38 P3d 880 (2002); Palmer v. State, 118 Nev. 823, 59 P-3d 1192 (2002); Labastida v. State, 115 Nev. 298, 986 P2d 443 (1999); State v. Second Judicial District Court, 116 Nev. 953, 11 P3d 1209 (2000); Love v. State of Nevada, 111 Nev 545, 893 P2d 376 (1995); United States v. Ritter, 989 F2d 318 (9th Cir. 1993); Gallego v. McDaniel 124 F3rd 1065 (9th Cir. 1997); Wilson v. Cyril Hampel 1985 Trust, 105 Nev. 607, 781 P.2d 769 (1989); United States v. Banks 506 F. 3d 756 (9th Cir. 2007). Practice Areas: Criminal Law; Appellate Practice; Criminal Appeals; Domestic Appeals.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|