Lawyers.com > Find a Lawyer > William-B.-Terry
Help

William B. Terry

William B. Terry 5.0 reviews - Read Reviews or Write a Review
William B. Terry is a Lawyer in Las Vegas, Nevada

Client Rating 5.0 / 5.0
Submit a review
Peer Rating 5.0 / 5.0
702-385-0799
View Web Site
http://www.williamterrylaw.com

Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Defense
  • Administrative Law
  • Juvenile Law

Contact Information

Currently Employed at

William B. Terry Chartered
Member
530 South Seventh Street,
Las Vegas, NV 89101
U.S.A.

Phone

702-385-0799

Fax

702-385-9788

Email

Send email to William B. Terry

Website

http://www.williamterrylaw.com
 

Overall Client Rating

in Criminal Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 08/19/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client? Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Admission Details

Admitted in 1973, Nevada
1974, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
1977, U.S. District Court, District of Nevada and U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth and Tenth Circuits
1982, U.S. Supreme Court

Payment Information
  • Accepts Visa, MasterCard and American Express
  • Free Initial Consultation
Law School Attended

University of San Diego
Class of 1973
J.D.

University Attended

University of Nevada
Class of 1969
B.A.

Birth Information

Born in August 31,1946
Chicago
Illinois

Associations & Memberships

Clark County and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Nevada; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Nevada Trial Lawyers Association; Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice.

Representative Cases

U.S. v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400 (9th Cir. 1985); U.S. v. Henderson, 680 F.2d 659 (9th Cir. 1982); U.S. v. Gallo, 659 F.2d 110 (9th Cir. 1981); U.S. v. Greger, 657 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1981); Tabish v. State, 72 P.3d 584 (2003); Salaiscooper v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 34 P.3d 509 (Nev. 2001); In re Fine, 116 Nev. 1001, 13 P.3d 400 (2000); Campbell vs. Eighth Judicial District Court, 114 Nev. 410, 957 P.2d 1141 (1998); Lytle v. State, 107 Nev. 589, 816 P.2d 1082 (1991); Burleigh v. State Bar of Nevada, 98 Nev. 140, 643 P.2d 1201 (1982); Hyler v. State, 98 Nev. 47, 639 P.2d 1201 (1982); Sheriff v. Provenz, 97 Nev. 346, 630 P.2d 265 (1981); Lane v. Trovinen, 97 Nev. 121, 624 P.2d 1385 (1981); Hunt v. State, 96 Nev. 550, 612 P.2d 683 (1980); Sheriff v. Standal, 95 Nev. 914, 604 P.2d 111 (1979); Sheriff v. Levinson, 95 Nev. 436, 596 P.2d 232 (1979); State v. Benigas, 95 Nev. 358, 594 P.2d 724 (1979); Arvey v. Sheriff, 93 Nev. 469, 567 P.2d 470 (1977); Burton v. Sheriff, 93 Nev. 346, 565 P.2d 1010 (1977); Arvey v. Sheriff, 93 Nev. 188, 561 P.2d 1341 (1977); Sheriff v. Arvey, 93 Nev. 72, 560 P.2d 153 (1977); McLellan vs. State, 182 P.3d 10b (Nev. 2008).

Biographical Details

Sigma Chi; Phi Beta Kappa; Phi Alpha Delta. Assistant United States Attorney, District of Nevada, 1973-1976. Alternate Municipal Court Judge, 1976. Lawyer Representative, 1981-1984 and Chairman, 1983-1984, to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Member, Com... More
Office Information
William B. Terry
530 South Seventh Street,
Las Vegas, NV 89101
U.S.A.
Loading...


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.