|
|
Address
520 South 4th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (Clark Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation  Accepts Credit Cards (Main Office) Statement of PracticeCriminal Defense, Drug Cases, Money Laundering, Felonies, Homicides, Sexual Assault, DUI, Personal Injury and Family Law, Divorce, White Collar Crime, Juvenile Crime. Year Established: 1976
Firm Size: 1
Languages: Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese.
Rate InformationFixed Fees Available
Free Initial Consultation
Accepts Major Credit Cards - Visa
- MasterCard
- American Express
Address520 South 4th Street, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89101, (Clark Co.)
PhonePhone: 702-385-7170
Fax: 702-385-2491
Website
http://www.johnmomot.com
Office HoursMonday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Tuesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Wednesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Thursday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Friday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
John J. Momot (Member) born Bayonne, New Jersey, May 30, 1943; admitted to bar, 1974, Nevada; 1975, U.S. District Court, District of Nevada; 1978, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1980, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Education: St. Peter's College (B.S., Accounting, 1965); Seton Hall School of Law (J.D., 1968). Public Defender, Clark County, Nev., 1974-1976. Member: Clark County and American Bar Associations; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; Nevada Association of Trial Lawyers; Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice. [Captain, U.S. Army, 1968-1970, Vietnam Veteran]. Reported Cases: Hylton vs. State of Nevada, 100 Nev.539, 688 P.2d 304 (1984); Robert Alan Slobodian v. The State of Nevada, No. 20848 808 P.2d 2 March 28, 1991; Walker v. Eight Judicial Dist. Court, 101 P.3d 787, 120 Nev. Adv. 88, 2004. Languages: Mandarin, Cantonese. Practice Areas: Criminal Law.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|