×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Robert A Miller

Not yet reviewed

1020 Highland Cove Pl Ste 1400, Ridgeland, MS 39157-1507

Aviation, Class Actions, Energy and 3 more

About Robert A Miller

Robert A Miller is a lawyer practicing aviation, class actions, energy and 3 other areas of law. Robert received a B.S. degree from University of Mississippi in 1972, and has been licensed for 45 years. Robert practices in Ridgeland, MS.

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Robert A Miller got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Robert

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Class Actions
  • Energy
  • Insurance
  • General Practice
  • Other 2
    • Aviation
    • Product Liability Litigation

Practice Details

  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Bouchillon v. Same Deutz-Fahr, Group et al, N.D. Miss. (March 10, 2016) NO. 1:2014cv00135.
    Mullen v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. et al, S.D. Miss. (November 4, 2015) NO. 1:2015cv00158.
    Leon v. Dale, U.S. Dist., S.D. Miss., (September 2, 2015) NO.5:15-cv-00072
    Mullen v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. et al, S.D. Miss. (August 17, 2015) NO. 1:15CV158-LG-RHW.
    BB Buggies, Inc. v. Leon, 150 So. 3d 90
    2014 Miss. LEXIS 543, Miss., (October 30, 2014) NO. 2012-IA-01876-SCT.
    Clevel
    Air Serv. v. Pratt & Whitney Can., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138303, N.D.Miss., (September 30, 2014) NO. 4:13-CV-00161 -DMB-DAS.
    Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp., 559 Fed. Appx. 375
    2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5184, C.A. 8, (March 19, 2014) NO. 12-60704.
    Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp, 134 S. Ct. 736, (January 14, 2014) NO. 12-1036.
    Creel v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60612, N.D.Miss., (April 26, 2013) NO. 1:09-CV-00161 -GHD-DAS.

    Davis v. Bombardier Rec. Prods., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44580, S.D.Miss., (March 28, 2013) NO. 3:11CV236TSL-MTP.
    In re Linton, 20S2 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86071, S.D.Miss., (June 21, 2012) NO. L12CV22-LG-JMR.
    McGee v. Willbros Constr., US, Inc., 20! 1 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148469, S.D.Miss., (December 27, 2011) NO: 5:1 S-CV-00080-DCB-JMR.
    In re Yamaha Motor Corp. Rhino Atv Prods. Liab. Litig., 816 F. Supp. 2d 442
    2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103538
    CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. PI 8, 695, W.D. Ky., (September 6, 2011) NO. 3:09-MD-2016-JBC, MDLNO. 2016.
    Jones v. Westwick Apts., LLC, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155695, S.D.Miss., (June 7, 2011) NO. 3:11cv00l25-CWR-FKB.
    Johnson v. Hankook Tire Mfg. Co., Ltd., Slip Copy, 2011 WL 39042, N.D.Miss., January 05, 2011 (NO. 2:09CV113-MPM-DAS).
    Boyd Tunica, Inc. v. Premier Transp. Services, Inc., 30 So.3d 1242, 2010 WL 776082, Miss.App., March 09, 2010 (NO. 2008-CA-01089-COA).
    Guidant Mut. Ins. Co. v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America,13 So.3d 1270, 2009 WL 1798818, Miss., June 25, 2009 (NO. 2006-CA-01472-SCT, 2007-CA-01593-SCT).
    Townsend v. Doosan Infracore American Corp., 3 So.3d 150, 2009 WL 368359, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 18,190, Miss.App., February 17, 2009 (NO. 2007-CA-01153-COA).
    Park on Lakel
    Drive, Inc. v. Spence,941 So.2d 203, 2006 WL 2975620, Miss., October 19, 2006 (NO. 2005-IA-02033-SCT).
    Jones v. Southern United Fire Ins., 935 So.2d 1127, 2006 WL 2256186, Miss.App., August 08, 2006 (NO. 2005-CA-00446-COA).
    Wansley v. Speed Corp., 900 So.2d 1167, 2005 WL 674864, Miss., March 24, 2005 (NO. 2003-CA-01682-SCT).
    PDN, Inc. v. Loring, 843 So.2d 685, 2003 WL 1923706, Miss., April 24, 2003 (NO. 2001-CA-01397-SCT).
    Stubbs v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 825 So.2d 8, 2002 WL 1340956, Miss., June 20, 2002 (NO. 1999-IA-01699-SCT).
    Miller v. R.B. Wall Oil Co., Inc., 850 So.2d 101, 2002 WL 982595, Miss.App., May 14, 2002 (NO. 2000-CA-01368-COA).
    Lake Hill Motors, Inc. v. Jim Bennett Yacht Sales, Inc., 246 F.3d 752, 2001 WL 303665, 2001-1 Trade Cases P 73,233, C.A.5 (Miss.), April 13, 2001 (NO. 99-60840).
    Miller v. Shell Oil Co., 783 So.2d 724, 2000 WL 688781, Miss.App., May 30, 2000 (NO. 1999-CA-00216-COA).
    Glover v. Jackson State University, 755 So.2d 395, 2000 WL 72713, Miss., January 27, 2000 (NO. 97-CA-01118-SCT, 97 CA 01426).
    Thompson v. Remington Arms Co., Inc., Slip Copy, 2010 WL 3737869, S.D.Miss., September 17, 2010 (NO. 5:09-CV-124 DCB JMR).
    R.N.R. ex rel. Rogers v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Slip Copy, 2010 WL 1794391, S.D.Miss., April 30, 2010 (NO. CIVA309CV608HTWLRA).
    l.N.R. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54686, S.D.Miss., (April 24, 2010) NO. 3:09cv608-HTW-LRA.
    Joiner v. Yamaha Motor Corp., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 457566, S.D.Miss., February 03, 2010 (NO. CIV.A.209CV196KSMTP).
    Yamaha Motor Corp. Rhino Atv Prods. Liab. Litig. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81487, W.D. Ky., (September 1, 2009) NO. 3:09-MD-02016-JBC, MDL NO. 2016.
    Donaldson Co. v. Burroughs Diesel, Inc., 581 F.3d 726
    2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20626, C.A. 8, (August 26, 2009) NO. 08-2705.
    Collins ex rel. Stokes v. O'Brien Energy Co., Slip Copy, 2009 WL 2482179, S.D.Miss., August 11, 2009 (NO. CIV.A. 4:09CV9TSLLRA).
    Delta Constructors, Inc. v. Roediger Vacuum, GmbH, 259 F.R.D. 245, 2009 WL 2408728, 74 Fed.R.Serv.3d 178, S.D.Miss., August 04, 2009 (NO.3:09CV119TSL-JCS).
    Barham v. Yamaha Motor Corp., W.D. Ky., (2009) NO. 3:09-MD-20I6-JBC, MDL NO. 2016.
    Walker v. George Koch Sons, Inc., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2008 WL 4371372, S.D.Miss., September 18, 2008 (NO. CIV.A.2:07CV274KSMTP).
    Perry v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2008 WL 190573, S.D.Miss., January 18, 2008 (NO. CIVA 207CV134-KS-MTP).
    Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 235 Fed. Appx. 213
    2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12561, C.A. 5, (May 30, 2007) NO. 06-60446.
    Moree v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2007 WL 656276, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 17,701, N.D.Miss., February 27, 2007 (NO. 3:06CV133DB).
    Wilson v. Scruggs, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99162, S.D.Miss., (November 6, 2006) NO. 3:02CV525WHB-JCS.
    Walker v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist LEXIS 61102, N.D.Miss., (August 24, 2006) NO. 4:05CV13-P-B.
    Baggett v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2006 WL 1520539, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 17,485, S.D.Miss., May 31, 2006 (NO. 3:06-CV-00184-TSL-JC).
    Boteler v. Pleko Southeast Corp., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2006 WL 1364387, S.D.Miss., May 16, 2006 (NO. CIV.A.3:06CV128LN).
    Prem v. Van Leesten, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42234, S.D.Miss., (April 7, 2006) NO. 3:05-CV-146WS.
    Lane v. Strang Communications Co., 297 F.Supp.2d 897, 2003 WL 23192533, 132 Media L. Rep. 2042, N.D.Miss., October 30, 2003 (NO. 1:02 CV 313-D-D).
    Wilson v. Richard F. Scruggs, P.A., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27953, S.D.Miss., (April 9, 2003) NO. 3:02CV525LN.
    Johnson v. Great American Ins. Co., 213 F.Supp.2d 657, 2001 WL 1917242, S.D.Miss., November 29, 2001 (NO. CIV.A.5:01CV177LN).
    Miller v. Fulton, 113 F.Supp.2d 1035, 2000 WL 1357503, S.D.Miss., August 07, 2000 (NO. CIV. A.3:00CV370LN).
    Lake Hill Motors, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 1999 WL 815606, 1999-2 Trade Cases P 72,653, N.D.Miss., August 23, 1999 (NO. CIV.A. 1:97CV395-BD).
    Patel v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat'l Pension Fund Holding, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19073, N.D.Miss., (November 13, 1998) NO. 4:98CV59-B-B.
    McLain v. American Intern. Recovery, Inc., 1 F.Supp.2d 628, 1998 WL 159794, S.D.Miss., March 31, 1998 (NO. CIV.A. 3:97-CV-796BN).
    Ranger Ins. Co. v. Heirs
    Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Branning By
    Through Tucker, 984 F.Supp. 466, 1997 WL 754375, S.D.Miss., June 23, 1997 (NO. CIV. A. 3:96CV813LN).
    Parker v. Byrd & Wiser, 947 F.Supp. 245, 1996 WL 673523, S.D.Miss., March 29, 1996 (NO. CIV.A. 3:95-CV-31WS).
    Main v. Office Depot, Inc., 914 F.Supp. 1413, 1996 WL 56064, S.D.Miss., January 31, 1996 (NO. CIV.A. 3:95-CV-135BN).
    Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp. v. Buelow, 670 So.2d 12, 1995 WL 753985, Miss., December 21, 1995 (NO. 94-CA-00881-SCT).
    Harvey v. Wall, 649 So.2d 184, 1995 WL 17745, Miss., January 19, 1995 (NO. 91-CA-00973).
    Wimbley v. Mathis, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21200, N.D.Miss., (December 27, 1994) NO. 4:93CV208-B-D.
    McFarl
    v. Utica Fire Ins. Co. of Oneida County, N.Y.,814 F.Supp. 518, 1992 WL 447180, S.D.Miss., December 16, 1992 (NO. CIV. A. J91-0125(W).
    Burley v. Homeowners Warranty Corp., 773 F.Supp. 844, 1990 WL 304854, S.D.Miss., February 09, 1990 (NO. CIV.A.J88-0334(B), CIV.A.J88-0318(W), CIV.A.J88-0317(L).
    Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., Inc., 886 F.2d 758, 1989 WL 118507, 15 Fed.R.Serv.3d 342, 28 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1231, C.A.5 (Miss.), October 26, 1989 (NO. 88-4712).
    Siroonian v. Textron, Inc., 844 F.2d 289, 1988 WL 36551, C.A.5 (Miss.), May 11, 1988 (NO. 87-4543).
    McGory v. Allstate Ins. Co., 527 So.2d 632, 1988 WL 42615, 56 USLW 2654, Miss., May 04, 1988 (NO. 57,650).
    Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc. v. Professional Investors Life Ins. Co., 475 So.2d 822, Miss., September 18, 1985 (NO. 55,694).
    May v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co., Not Reported in F.Supp., 1983 WL 2148, N.D.Miss., January 19, 1983 (NO. EC 82-347-LS-P).
    Pate v. S
    ers, N.D.Miss., NO. 4:98CV140-D-B.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1981, Mississippi
    U.S. District Courts, Mississippi: Northern and Southern Districts
    U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, 6th Circuit, 8th Circuit
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Associations

    International Association of Defense Counsel (IADC)

    Product Liability Advisory Council (PLAC)

    Defense Research Institute (DRI)

    Aerospace Law Committee

    National Lawyers Association

    Federalist Society

    Christian Legal Society

    Mississippi Bar Association

    Litigation Section

    Mississippi Defense Lawyers Association

    Mississippi Claims Association

    Capital Area Bar Association

    Fifth Circuit Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Mississippi
    Class of 1981
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    University of Mississippi
    Class of 1972
    B.S.
    Chemical Engineering
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1949
    1949

Robert A Miller

Not yet reviewed

1020 Highland Cove Pl Ste 1400Ridgeland, MS 39157-1507U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Robert Kelly Kyle
Pro
Robert Kelly Kyle
4.7
10
Aviation Law lawyer

Free Consultation

769-768-6515
View Profile

Email Robert A Miller

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions