no photo

About Atty. Corey Lee Gordon

Atty. Corey Lee Gordon is a lawyer practicing class action defense, commercial litigation, food industry defense and 1 other area of law. Corey received a B.A. degree from Macalester College in 1976, and has been licensed for 46 years. Corey practices in Minneapolis, MN.

Awards

Reviews for Corey

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Products Liability
  • Other 2
    • Class Action Defense
    • Food Industry Defense

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    REPRESENTATIVE CASES: In Re: Bair Hugger MDL Summary Judgement Victory. Won a l
    mark victory for 3M Company in the federal Bair Hugger Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) securing the dismissal of one of the 10 largest MDLs in the country. The MDL court dismissed the more than 5,000 cases against 3M after it entered summary judgment for 3M
    granted the firm's motion to exclude the opinions of the plaintiffs' experts. Measured by the number of cases dismissed, the summary judgment win represents one of the largest-impact defense wins in history.
    In Re: Max Mason Posthumous Pardon. Collaborated with the Clayton Jackson McGhie Memorial, Inc., the Minnesota Historical Society, members of the Federal Bar,
    other supporters, to successfully secure the posthumous pardon of Max Mason, who was wrongfully convicted of raping a White woman in 1920. The pardon was the first ever in Minnesota State history, in commemoration of the 100-year anniversary of his conviction
    the brutal lynching of three Black circus workers in Duluth - the only lynchings in Minnesota's history.
    Hebrew National Putative Nationwide Class Action. Complete defense victory for ConAgra Foods, Inc. in putative class action based on allegation that their Hebrew National br
    beef products are not 100% kosher. The case was first dismissed with prejudice by the federal district court in Minnesota after the court agreed with the defense's argument that plaintiffs' claims could not be adjudicated consistent with the First Amendment's Establishment Clause. On appeal, The Eighth Circuit agreed with the defense's separate argument that plaintiffs also lacked Article III st
    ing to pursue their claims. Following rem
    to state court in Dakota County, Minnesota, the state district court agreed with both of the defense's arguments regarding the First Amendment
    St
    ing, dismissing the putative class action with prejudice.
    General Mills East Hennepin Environmental Class Action. Defended General Mills, Inc., against class action claims brought by residents claiming vapor intrusion from groundwater contamination from a former General Mills facility. Class certification was reversed by the 8th Circuit.
    Yo-Plus Consumer Class Action. Defended General Mills, Inc. against a class action, on behalf of California purchasers, alleging that Yo-Plus probiotic yogurt did not promote digestive health as advertised. General Mills retained the firm as trial counsel after the court granted class certification. Blackwell Burke obtained de-certification of the class's claims for damages, including its claim for punitive damages.
    Newkirk v. ConAgra Foods. Refuted primary argument that consumer exposure to popcorn additives was comparable to industrial-level exposure. A Washington federal district court rendered a 70-page opinion that excluded plaintiff's experts on Daubert grounds, granted summary judgment
    dismissed all claims in favor of ConAgra Foods, Inc. Mr. Gordon argued the successful motions in the trial court
    the winning appeal before the Ninth Circuit.
    Egilman v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 1583 (2013). Represented ConAgra Foods in successfully opposing an expert's petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case involved the issue of whether an expert witness has third-party st
    ing to appeal a district court's Daubert ruling.
    Gareis v. 3M Company (Bair Hugger ). Won a complete defense verdict for one of the world's largest global innovation manufacturing companies in the first product liability multidistrict litigation (MDL) bellwether trial in Minnesota Federal District Court. The jury agreed with the defense that the warming device did not cause surgical site infections. This case is one of more than 5,000 cases in the Minnesota MDL all involving numerous complex novel scientific legal issues. Also secured dismissal of all Minnesota State cases, prevented Plaintiffs from adding punitive damages, won a significant motion to compel, securing more than $11,000 in fees
    costs for client. The verdict was widely covered in the media.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    State and federal district courts of Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, and Wisconsin
    First, Second, Third, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeals
    U.S. Supreme Court
    1995, Florida
    1993, Illinois
    1980, Minnesota
    1991, New York
    1987, Wisconsin
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Minnesota Law School
    Class of 1980
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University of Minnesota Law School
    Class of 1980
    J.D.
    Staff Member

    University of Minnesota Law School
    Class of 1980
    J.D.
    Minnesota Law Review
    Other Education
    Macalester College
    Class of 1976
    B.A.
    Physics & Psychology

    Macalester College
    Class of 1976
    B.A.
    Editor-in-Chief

    Macalester College
    Class of 1976
    B.A.
    The Mac Weekly
Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number: