|
|
Address
333 West Fort Street, Suite 1100
Detroit, Michigan 48226 (Wayne Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeCriminal Defense, Grand Jury Proceedings, Trials and Appeals and Post Convictions Proceedings in Michigan and Federal Courts. Year Established: 1995
Firm Size: 3
Harold Gurewitz (Member) born Benton Harbor, Michigan, November 22, 1945; admitted to bar, 1970, Michigan; 1973, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan; 1976, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit; 1991, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: Michigan State University (B.A., 1967); Wayne State University (J.D., 1970). Member, Moot Court. Member, Editorial Review Board, Corporate Criminal Liability Reporter, 1986-1988. Recipient: U.S. Attorney General Award, 1978; Gilman Award for Outstanding Criminal Practitioners, Federal Bar Association, 1998. Assistant U.S. Attorney and Chief, Economic Crime Unit, Eastern District of Michigan, 1973-1981. Attorney-Advisor, U.S. Department HUD, 1971-1973. Board Member, Legal Aid and Defender Association. Chairman, Legal Committee, Detroit Casino Study Commission, 1988. Member: City of Detroit, Board of Ethics, 1988; Editorial Advisory Board, Federal Criminal Rules and Practice, James Publishing. Commissioner: Detroit Board of Water Commissioners; Detroit Board of Police Commissioners, 1989-1993. Member: Detroit, Federal and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Michigan; Federal Criminal Defense Lawyers Association of Michigan (President, 1987-1988); National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan. Reported Cases: United States v. Campbell, 291 F.Supp.2d 547 (E.D. Mich. 2003); United States v. Garcia, 68 F.Supp.2d 802 (ED MI, 1999); United States v. Debs, 949 F2d 199 (6th Cir, 1991); People v. Weiss, 191 Mich App 553, 479 NW2d 30 (1991); Callanan v. U.S., 881 F2d 229 (6th Cir, 1989); United States v. Garcia 143 F. Supp. 2d 791 (E.D. Mich., 2000); United States v. Mikell, 163 F. Supp. 2d 720 (E.D. Mich., 2001). Practice Areas: Criminal Defense; Drug Trafficking; White Collar Criminal Defense.Email: Harold Gurewitz
Margaret Sind Raben (Member) admitted to bar, 1986, Michigan and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan; 1990, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit; 1993, U.S. Supreme Court; 1997, U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan. Education: Monteith College (B.Ph., 1969); Wayne State University (M.A., 1972; J.D., 1986). Recipient, 2005 National Lawyers Guild Defender of Justice Award. Member: Detroit, Federal and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Michigan; Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan (First Vice President); Women Lawyers Association of Michigan; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Reported Cases: U.S. v Ogbuh, 982 F2d 1000 (6th Cir, 1993); U.S. v. Calhoun, 999 F2d 540 (6th Cir, 1993); U.S. v. Strong, 7 F3d 236 (6th Cir); U.S. v. Ward 37 F 3d 243 (6th Cir., 1994); U.S. v. Koubriti, 2004 US Dist LEXIS 17561 (ED Mich, 9/2/04). Practice Areas: Criminal Law.Email: Margaret Sind Raben
Amy Parekh (Member) born Port Huron, Michigan; admitted to bar, 2003, Illinois; 2004, District of Columbia; 2006, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan; 2007, Michigan. Education: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (B.A., 1999; J.D., 2002). Moot Court Judge, University of District of Columbia. Trial Advocacy Skills, Children's Law Center, 2004-2006. Member: State Bar of Michigan; Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|