|
|
Address
144 West Maple Road, Suite 100
Birmingham, Michigan 48009 (Oakland Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Accepts Credit Cards (Main Office) Morgan Associates PLC was founded upon a simple idea: drastic changes and improvement in information and communication technologies permit and require similar transformations in the nature of commercial legal services and the methods by which these services are provided to clients. By focusing first on quantifying a client's economic objectives, and then working with the client to design, assemble and manage an appropriate team of lawyers and other experts to achieve those objectives, the firm provides a cost effective way to exploit new opportunities and manage related risks. The firm's practice includes the direct delivery of legal services, primarily related to complex commercial litigation within the Midwest, and the management of legal services provided through the firm's associated lawyers located throughout North America. Statement of PracticeCommercial Transactions, Commercial Litigation, Systems Litigation, Information and Communications Technology Litigation, Trademark Licensing and Enforcement, Licensing and Licensing Disputes, Construction Litigation, Bankruptcy and Creditor Planning, Corporate, Business Planning and Franchise Litigation, Civil Litigation, Commercial Law, Commercial Leasing, Finance, Financial Services Law. Firm Size: 1
Languages: Greek.
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Accepts Major Credit Cards
Address144 West Maple Road, Suite 100
Birmingham, MI 48009, (Oakland Co.)
PhonePhone: 248-594-6340
Fax: 248-594-8766
Website
http://www.morganassociatesplc.com.
Office HoursMonday: By Appointment Only: 07:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Tuesday: By Appointment Only: 07:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Wednesday: By Appointment Only: 07:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Thursday: By Appointment Only: 07:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Friday: By Appointment Only: 07:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Kenneth B. Morgan (Principal) born Royal Oak, Michigan, November 23, 1957; admitted to bar, 1982, Michigan and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan; 1984, U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan and U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit; 1993, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio; 1994, U.S. Supreme Court; 2004, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana; 2009, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Education: University of Michigan (A.B., 1979); University of Detroit (J.D., 1982). Member, National Order of Barristers. Member, 1980-1981 and Administrative Director, Executive Board of Directors, 1981-1982, Moot Court Board of Directors. Staff Attorney, Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, 1982-1985. Member, Oakland County Prosecutor's Office, 1984. Member: State Bar of Michigan (Member: Commercial Litigation Section). Reported Cases: Robert A. Hansen Family Trust v. FGH Industries, LLC, 279 Mich. App. 468; 760 N.W.2d 526 (2008); Leelanau Wine Cellars Ltd. v. Black & Red, Inc., 118 Fed. App. 942, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 27207, December 29, 2004; Am. Speedy Printing Ctrs. v. AM Mktg., Inc., 69 Fed. App. 692, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13871, July 8, 2003; Broyde v. Gotham Tower, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 540, 1994 Fed. App. 0007P (6th Cir.), 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 227; Scarton V. Charles, 115 F.R.D. 567 (1987); Zahra v. Charles, 639 F. Supp. 1405 (1986); In re Loyd, 424 Mich. 514, 384 N.W.2d 9 (1986); In re Callanan, 419 Mich. 376, 355 N.W.2d 69 (1984); In re Lawrence, 417 Mich. 248, 335 N.W.2d 456 (1983). Practice Areas: Commercial Litigation(30%); Real Estate Litigation(70%).Email: Kenneth B. Morgan
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|