|
|
Address
8401 Colesville Road, Suite 325
Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 (Montgomery Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Accepts Credit Cards (Main Office) Alan Banov and Associates represents individuals and unions in employment and labor matters throughout Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia. The firm provides clients with the highest quality litigation and counseling services that proudly reflect Mr. Banov's 30 years of experience. Statement of PracticeLabor and Employment, Employment Litigation, Wrongful Termination, Discrimination, Wage and Hour Cases, Severance Pay Agreements, Mediation, Settlement Negotiation, Civil Service, Personnel Policies, Class Actions, Employment Contracts. Year Established: 1980
Firm Size: 3
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Accepts Major Credit Cards - Visa
- MasterCard
- Other - Diners Club
Address8401 Colesville Road, Suite 325
Silver Spring, MD 20910, (Montgomery Co.)
PhonePhone: 301-588-9699
Fax: 301-588-9698
Call Firm Now 
Website
http://www.banovlaw.com
Office HoursMonday: 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
Tuesday: 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
Wednesday: 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
Thursday: 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
Friday: 09:00 AM - 05:30 PM
Alan Banov (Member) born Charleston, South Carolina, 1946; admitted to bar, 1971, District of Columbia and U.S. District Court, District of Columbia; 1980, Maryland, Court of Appeals of Maryland, U.S. District Court, Trial Bar, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, U.S. Court of Appeals, First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits. Education: University of North Carolina (A.B., 1967); George Washington University (J.D., with honors, 1971). Frequent lecturer on Employment Law and Litigation, including National Conventions, National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA), 1999-2000. Moderator and Co-Chair, NELA National Convention, June 2000. Speaker, Georgetown University Law, Center Employment Law Seminar, 2001 and 2003. Author: "When May Employees Sue States under the Federal Civil Rights Acts" 2 Employee Rights Quarterly 43 (summer 2001). National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Regional Advice Branch, 1971-1974, Appellate Court Branch, 1974-1979. Mediator: Montgomery County Human Relations Commission, 1994; Superior Court of District of Columbia, 1998. Member: District of Columbia Bar; National Employment Lawyers Association; Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association (Board Member, 1990; President, 1998-2000). Reported Cases: Doby v. Safeway Stores, 523 F.Supp. 1162 (E.D.Va. 1981); Gilliam v. Glover, 470 A.2d 750 (D.C. App. 1983); Janet Hill v. Dept. of Health & Human Services, 27 MSPB 668 (1985); Webb v. U.S. Postal Service, 776 F.2d 1060 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (argued); Salyer v. D.C. Public Schools, 44 FEP Cases 1834 (D.D.C. 1987); Adkins v. United States, 816 F.2d 1580 (Fed. Cir. 1987); Keyes v. Secretary of the Navy, 853 F.2d 1016 (1st Cir. 1988); Stephenson v. Martin Marietta, Inc., 48 FEP Cases 37 (D. Md. 1988); Goos v. National Association of Realtors, 715 F.Supp. 2 (D.D.C. 1989); Goos v. National Assn. of Realtors, 57 FEP Cases 1531 (D.D.C. 1991); Goos v. National Assn. of Realtors, 997 F.2d 1565 (D.C. Cir. 1992); Goos v. National Assn. of Realtors, 68 F.3d 1380 (D.C. Cir. 1995); Kentucky Fried Chicken National Management Co. v. Weathersby, 326 Md. 663, 607 A.2d 8 (1991); Weathersby v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Nat. Mgt. Co., 804 F.Supp. 756 (D. Md. 1992); Albright v. United States, 26 C. Ct. 1119 (1992), aff'd, Albright v. United States, 10 F.3d 3 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Albright v. United States, 10 F.3d 3 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Green v. Howard University, C.A. No. 91-4194 (D.C. Super. Ct., Dec. 4, 1992), 121 Wash. L. Rep. 629 (Mar. 31, 1993); Howard University v. Green, 652 A.2d 41 (D.C. 1994); Johnson v. D.C. Public Schools, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9588 (D.D.C. 1995); Halperin v. Abacus Technology, 128 F.3d 191 (4th Cir. 1997); Simpkins v. WMATA, 1997 WL 702349 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (unpublished); Stroman v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Ass'n, 966 F.Supp. 9 (D.D.C. 1997); Freas v. Archer Services, 716 A.2d 998, 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 163 (D.C. 1998); Guerra v. Cuomo, 176 F.3d 547 (D.C. Cir. 1999); Weigert v. Georgetown University, 43 F.Supp. 2d 5 (D.D.C. 1999); Litman v. George Mason University, 186 F.3d 544, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17825 (4th Cir. 1999); George Mason University v. United States and Litman, 120 S. Ct. 1220 (2000). Co-Author, amicus briefs: Gray v. Citizens Bank of Washington, 609 A.2d 1143 (D.C. 1992) (en banc); Thigpen v. Greenpeace, Inc., 657 A.2d 770, 123 Wash. L. Rep. 953 (D.C. 1995); Carlsen v. Unites States, 72 Fed. Cl. 782 (2006); Bishop v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 766 (2006), 74 Fed. Cl. 144 (2006). Practice Areas: Employment Law; Employment Relations; Wrongful Termination; Discrimination; Wage and Hour Law; Labor Law; Litigation.
ASSOCIATERachelle Ware (Associate) admitted to bar, 2007, Virginia; 2008 U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. (Not admitted in Maryland). Education: Southern Connecticut State University (B.S., magna cum laude, Political Science, Business Management, 2004); George Washington University School of Law (J.D., 2007). Practice Areas: Employment Law; Civil Rights; Discrimination; Litigation.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|