|
|
Address
204 Monroe Street, Suite 109
Rockville, Maryland 20850 (Montgomery Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
4.7
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation (Main Office) Statement of PracticeCriminal Defense, Drug Crimes, Driving Under the Influence, White Collar Crime, Business Fraud, Traffic Violations, Homicide, Sex Crimes, Felonies, Misdemeanors, Domestic Violence, Theft, Assault, Burglary, Post Conviction Remedies. Year Established: 1981
Firm Size: 3
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Free Initial Consultation
Address204 Monroe Street, Suite 109
Rockville, MD 20850, (Montgomery Co.)
PhonePhone: 301-762-0505
Fax: 301-762-0080
URL: http://www.lawyers.com/armstronglawfirm
Website
http://www.armstrongcheris.com
Office HoursMonday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Tuesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Wednesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Thursday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Friday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Philip H. Armstrong (Member) born Washington, D.C., April 18, 1947; admitted to bar, 1973, Maryland; 1979, U.S District Court, District of Maryland; 1980, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: Yale University (B.A., 1968); Georgetown University (J.D., 1973). Named as one of "Top Lawyers," Criminal Defense, Washingtonian Magazine, Dec. 2004. Listed: "Super Lawyers," Washington, District of Columbia and Maryland Editions, 2007-2008; The Best Lawyers in America, Criminal Defense, 2007. Editor, Georgetown Law Journal, 1972-1973. Law Clerk to the Honorable John F. McAuliffe, Circuit Court for Montgomery County, 1973-1974. Senior Assistant State's Attorney, Montgomery County, Maryland, 1974-1978. Bar Leaders, 1991. Member: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; Maryland Criminal Defense Attorneys Association (Member, Board of Directors, 1984; Vice-President, 1988-1990; President-Elect, 1990-1991; President, 1991). Reported Cases: William Fagan v. State of MD (trial counsel), 110 MD App. 228, 676 A2d 1009 (1996); Darone Derricott v. State of Maryland, 327 MD 582, 611 A2d 592 (1992); Donald Lewis v. State of Maryland, 71 MD App. 402, 526 A. 2d 66 (1987).Email: Philip H. Armstrong
Howard R. Cheris (Member) born New York; admitted to bar, 1991, Maryland; 1992, District of Columbia; 1993, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland; 1994, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; 1997, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; 1999, New York. Education: Emory University (B.A., 1988); Washington College of Law of American University (J.D., 1991). Of Counsel, Rochon, Roberts & Stern, Washington, District of Columbia, 2000-2003. Member: Montgomery County Bar Association (Member, Federal Selections Committee, 1992); Maryland Bar Association, Inc.; District of Columbia Bar. Languages: Spanish. Practice Areas: Criminal Law; Personal Injury; Workers Compensation; Estate Litigation; Estate Administration; Business Transactions; Business Litigation.
ASSOCIATECatherine Woolley (Associate) admitted to bar, 2003, Maryland. Education: Georgetown University (B.A., 1995); University of Maryland (J.D., 2002).
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|