|
|
Address
5700 Coastal Highway
Ocean City, Maryland 21842 (Worcester Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
4.4
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation (Main Office) Statement of PracticeCriminal Law, Driving While Intoxicated, Traffic Violations, Automobile Accidents, Personal Injury. Year Established: 1974
Firm Size: 1
Languages: Spanish.
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Free Initial Consultation
Address5700 Coastal Highway
Ocean City, MD 21842, (Worcester Co.)
PhonePhone: 410-524-3440
Fax: 410-524-3450
Call Firm Now 
Website
http://www.wimbrowlaw.com
Office HoursMonday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Tuesday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Wednesday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Thursday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Friday: 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Saturday: By Appointment Only
Sunday: By Appointment Only
Peter Ayers Wimbrow, III (Member) born Salisbury, Maryland, April 11, 1947; admitted to bar, 1973, Maryland; 1979, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; 1981, U.S. Tax Court and U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Education: East Tennessee State University (B.S., 1970); Washington & Lee University (J.D., 1973). Member: Worcester County (Past President), Maryland State (Past Member, Board of Governors) and American Bar Associations; Maryland Trial Lawyers Association; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; Maryland Criminal Defense Attorneys Association (Board of Governors); National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Reported Cases: Huemmer v. Mayor and City Council of Ocean City, 632 F.2d 371 (C.A. 4, Md., 1980); Widgeon v. Eastern Shore Hosp. Center, 479 A.2d 921 (Md. 1984); De Franks v. Mayor and City Council of Ocean City, 777 F.2d 185 (C.A. 4, MD., 1985); Davis v. DiPino, 655 A.2d 401 (Md. 1995); Schrimser v. State, 599 A.2d 444 (Md. 1991); DiPino v. Davis, 729 A.2d 354 (Md. 1999); Seip v. State, 153 Md. App. 83, 835 A.2d 187 (2002); Ocean City Police Department v. Marshall, 158 Md. App. 115, 854 A.2d 299 (2004); Lee by Lee v. U.S., 124 F.3d 1291 (FED. 1997); Weakland vs. U.S., 287nd 611 (Md.) 2003; Toth v. State, 398 Md. 318, 901 A.2d 820 (2005). Anderson v. General Casualty Insurance Company, 402 MD. 236, 935 A.2d 746 (2007). Languages: Spanish. Practice Areas: Criminal Law; Personal Injury.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|