Help

John W. RedmannLinkedIn

John W. Redmann 5.0 reviews - Read Reviews or Write a Review
John W. Redmann is a Lawyer in Metairie, Louisiana

Client Rating 5.0 / 5.0
Submit a review
Peer Rating 4.6 / 5.0
504-433-5550
View Web Site

Free Consultation

Areas of Law

Pro Bono

Personal Injury Wrongful Death Brain Injury Medical Malpractice
Personal Injury
60%
Wrongful Death
20%
Brain Injury
10%
Medical Malpractice
10%
Other Areas of Law

Workers Compensation, Civil Practice, Helicopter Crash Litigation, Insurance, Legal Malpractice, Torts, Whiplash

Contact Information

Currently Employed at

Law Office of John W. Redmann, LLC
Director
2901 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 201,
Metairie, LA 70002
U.S.A.

Phone

504-433-5550

Cell Phone

504-905-4995

Fax

504-433-5556

Email

Send email to John W. Redmann

Website

http://www.redmannlaw.com
http://www.twitter.com/johnredmannatty
http://www.redmannlawblog.blogspot.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Law-Office-of-John-W-Redmann/133572033391776?sk=wall

Networking
 

Overall Client Rating

in Insurance and Personal Injury
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
4.8

  • Data based on 6 reviews
  • Recommended by 6 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 08/09/11
Posted by a Consumer on 08/09/11
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
John Redmann came highly recommended, and we know that we couldn't have done better anywhere. Wonderful staff and great office manager.
Posted by a Consumer on 08/08/11
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
The service was very good, the communication was good, they always called me back, and when I came they saw me quickly, and at the end of the service everything was fine. They get you real good money.
Posted by a Consumer on 08/04/11
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
There should be workers like Mr. Redmann's staff, they are very polite, professional, considerate, and they try to help all they can.
Posted by a Consumer on 12/09/10
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr. Redmann provided excellent representation. The results he got for me were more than what I expected. He will be my attorney for any situation that may arise. His staff is highly capable and very courteous. I have also recommended Mr. Redmann to my family and friends for legal representation.
Posted by a Consumer on 12/09/10
Recommended
4.8 out of 5.0
Office staff is very nice and organized. They provide quick responses and answered all of my concerns. I would recommend this lawyer (or any of his associates) to anyone who needs a really good attorney.

Experience & Credentials

Admission Details

Admitted in 1990, Louisiana
1990, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana
1996, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth and Fifth Circuits
2008, U.S. Supreme Court

Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
Law School Attended

Loyola University Law School
Class of 1989
J.D.

University Attended

Loyola University of the South
B.A.
French/Psychology
Class of 1986

Birth Information

Born at New Orleans
Louisiana

Languages

French and Spanish

Associations & Memberships

Louisiana State Bar Association (Treasurer, Bench and Bar Section); Louisiana Trial Lawyers Association; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; Academy of New Orleans Trial Lawyers.

Representative Cases

Kodrin v. State Farm Insurance Co., et al., US Supreme Court, 2009, (Writ App. from E.D. La., 11/7/07, No. 06-8180, & US 5th Cir. Court, 2008); Bowman v. Lexington Insurance Co., No. 06-9091 (E.D. La., 10/30/07); O'Rorke v. State Farm Fire Insurance Co., No. 07-7947 (E.D. La., 3/24/08); Castillo v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co., (E.D. La., 1/29/08); Bowman v. Lexington Insurance Co., No. 06-9091 (E.D. La., 12/14/06); Hyatt v. State Farm Insurance Co., No. 06-8792-SSV-SS (E.D. La., 3/25/08); Wlliams v. Bickham, No. 04-10639 (Court of Appeal of La., 4th Circuit, 1/28/09); Hyatt v. State Farm Insurance Co., No. 06-7162 (E.D. La., 1/17/07); Kovesdi v. Allstate Indemnity Co., No. 10-697 (E.D. La., 11/2/10); Sisson v. American Family Home Insurance Co., Nos. 06-4881, 07-1552, 07-4838 (E.D. La., 10/29/07); Hyatt v. State Farm Insurance Co., No. 06-8792 (E.D. La., 2/7/07); Rivera v. Interface Sec. Systems, LLC, No. 10-4157 (E.D. La., 8/22/11); Hall v. Mac Papers, Inc., No. 10-4409 (E.D. La., 6/1/11); Derouen v. State Farm Insurance Co., No. 06-8919 (E.D. La., 3/19/07); Reyes-Ramirez v. Progressive Sec. Insurance Co. (Court of Appeal of La., 3rd Circuit, 11/5/08); Chavez v. Homesite Insurance Co., No. (E.D. La., 7/8/11); Rodriguez v. Southern Fidelity Insurance Co., No. 10-3037 (E.D. La., 2/23/11); Assaf v. Allstate Indemnity Co., No. 10-1063 (E.D. La., 11/8/10); Walker v. Allstate Indemnity Co., No. 07-3199 (E.D. La., 8/24/07); In re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation (E.D. La., 7/27/07); Borne-Franklin v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. (E.D. La., 11/29/07); Howard v. Western Auto Supply Co. (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, New Orleans, 11/27/1939); Hyatt v. State Farm Insurance Co., No. 06-8792 (E.D. La., 2/25/08); Robinson v. ZV Sterling Insurance Agency (E.D. La., 11/20/07); D'Juve v. ZC Sterling Insurance, Inc. (E.D. La., 12/03/07); Herbert v. State Farm Insurance Co. (E.D. La., 12/22/08); Brooks v. Tradesmen International, Inc. (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 4th Circuit, 9/1/04); Ladner v. Government Employees' Insurance Co. (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 4th Circuit, 10/8/08); Assaf v. Allstate Indemnity Co., No. 10-1063 (E.D. La., 7/27/11); Kovesdi v. Allstate Indemnity Co., No. 10-697 (E.D. La., 9/24/10); Cherry v. Audubon Insurance Co. (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 4th Circuit, 10/20/10); Boutin v. Oakwood Village Nursing Home (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 3rd Circuit, 4/2/97); Zavala v. St. Joe Brick Works, Inc. (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 1st Circuit, 12/17/04); Lambert v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. (E.D. La., 5/30/08); Fairgrounds Corp v. Louisiana State Racing Commission (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 4th Circuit, 10/10/1974); Batiste v. Antonio (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 4th Circuit, 1/21/1998); Herrera v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland (E.D. La., 2/1/08); Louisiana v. AAA Ins. (E.D. La., 9/30/09); Lozes v. Lozes (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 5th Circuit, 4/12/1989); Zavala v. St. Joe Brick Works (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 1st Circuit, 10/31/08); Prestenbach v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., Inc. (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, 5th Circuit, 4/14/1994); Lambert v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. (E.D. La., 5/20/08); In re Katrina Canal Litigation Breaches (US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, 4/11/08).

Biographical Details

AV-Preeminent Rating (highest possible), Martindale.com (also 5 out of 5 overall rating by clients, on this website); Inductee, Louisiana Bar Foundation, c. 2003; Louisiana Bar Assn., Treasurer, Bench and Bar Section (c. 2003 - present); American Inns of C... More
Office Information
John W. Redmann
2901 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 201,
Metairie, LA 70002
U.S.A.
Loading...

Law Office of John W Redmann LLC
Law Office of John W. Redmann, LLC (Metairie, Louisiana)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.