|
|
Address
911 College Street, Suite 200
Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101 (Warren Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
4.4
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeGeneral Civil Trial and Appellate Practice in State and Federal Courts. Labor and Employment, Insurance and Commercial Litigation. Firm Size: 1
Matthew J. Baker (Member) born Tempe, Arizona, July 5, 1961; admitted to bar, 1986, Kentucky; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit; U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Kentucky; U.S. Court of Military Appeals. Education: University of Kentucky (B.A., English, magna cum laude, 1983); Wake Forest University (J.D., 1986). Judge, Kentucky Court of Appeals, 2003. Member: Bowling Green-Warren County (Member, Board of Directors), Kentucky, American and Federal (Secretary, Kentucky Chapter, 2002) Bar Associations. [Judge Advocate, U.S. Marine Corps, 1987-1990]. Reported Cases: Richardson v. Dodson, Ky., 832 S.W.2d 888 (1992); Southernland v. Hardaway Management Co., Inc., 41 F.3d 250 (6th Cir. 1994); Eades v. Clark Distributing Co., Inc., 70 F.3d 441 (6th Cir. 1995); Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. George, Ky., 953 S.W.2d 946 (1997); Hardaway Management Co. v. Southerland Ky. 977 S.W.2d 910 (1998); Bowling Green Municipal Utilities v. Atmos Energy Corp., Ky., 989 S.W.2d 577 (1999); Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson. Ky., 36 S.W.3d 368 (2000); Board of Educ. of Estill County, Kentucky v. Zurich Ins. Co., 180 F.Supp.2d 890 (E.D.Ky. 2002); LaFleur v. Shoney's, Inc., Ky. 83 S.W.3d 474 (2002). Practice Areas: Civil Practice; Appellate Practice; Business Law; Corporate Law.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|