×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Stephanie Lynn Marett

Stephanie Lynn Marett

Not yet reviewed

700 Walnut St., Ste. 1300, Des Moines, IA 50309

Litigation, Business and Commercial Litigation, Insurance Coverage and Conduct and 5 more

About Stephanie Lynn Marett

Stephanie Lynn Marett is a lawyer practicing litigation, business and commercial litigation, insurance coverage and conduct and 5 other areas of law. Stephanie received a B.A. degree from Luther College in 1995, and has been licensed for 27 years. Stephanie practices at Nyemaster Goode, P.C. in Des Moines, IA.

Stephanie Lynn Marett (Des Moines, Iowa)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Stephanie Lynn Marett got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Stephanie

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Other 6
    • Business and Commercial Litigation
    • Insurance Coverage and Conduct
    • Life and Disability Insurance Litigation
    • Workers' Compensation
    • Personal Injury and Tort Defense
    • Employment Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Nyemaster Goode, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Cases: Paulino v. Chartis Claims, Inc., No. 3:11-cv-00096 (S.D. Iowa May 3, 2013). District Court granted summary judgment in Chartis's favor
    dismissed the case, finding Chartis acted in an objectively reasonable manner when it withdrew authorization for Paulino's continued rehabilitation residence, thereby precluding a bad faith claim. S
    berg v. Rubbermaid Home Products, 2008 WL 5234378 (Iowa Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2008). Appellate counsel for case wherein the Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's reversal of the Iowa workers' compensation commissioner. The Iowa Court of Appeals held that chronic pain alone cannot serve as the basis for converting a scheduled member injury to a body as a whole injury. Rogers v. Energy Panel Structures, et al ., No. 07-458 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2007). The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the district court decision, which dismissed all breach of contract, warranty,
    negligence claims against client EPS because the co-defendant dealer was not an agent of EPS. Singh v. Allen Mem'l Hosp., No. 6:04-cv-2090 (N.D. Iowa Aug. 3, 2006). Directly involved in case
    second chair at jury trial, which resulted in a defense verdict on claims of national origin
    race discrimination. Walker v. Waste Mgmt ., No. 95502 (Iowa Dist. Ct. Oct. 2005). Directly involved in case, which resulted in a defense verdict on negligence claims from an electric shock injury. Bowers v. Polk County Bd. of Supervisors, No. 01-1636 (Iowa Supreme Ct. Jan. 7, 2002). Directly involved in amicus curiae brief addressing constitutional issues on behalf of the Greater Des Moines Partnership. The brief was filed in support of the district court's judgment affirming the Polk County Board of Supervisors' decision to authorize the issuance of essential county purpose bonds for the Iowa Event Center without holding a public referendum. The Iowa Supreme Court upheld the district court's judgment.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1999, Iowa
    All State and Federal Courts in Iowa and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
    Memberships

    Professional And Community Affiliations
    American Bar Association
    Litigation Section

    Iowa State Bar Association
    YLD Mock Trial Committee, 2000-2011
    Litigation Section
    Workers' Compensation Section

    Polk County Bar Association
    Co-Chair, Public Relations Committee, 2004-2008

    Defense Research Institute

    Iowa Association of Workers' Compensation Lawyers
    Co-Chair, Annual Seminar Committee, 2007-2009

    Iowa Defense Counsel Association

    Iowa Self-Insured Association
    Annual Seminar Committee, 2010-present

    Graduate, Greater Des Moines Leadership Institute, Class of 2012

    Member, Community Advisory Board, Junior League of Des Moines, 2000-present

    Volunteer, Beaverdale Neighborhood Association

    Parent Teacher Association for Perkins Academy
    Vice President, 2010-2012

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Drake University
    Class of 1999
    J.D.
    with high honors
    Other Education
    Luther College
    Class of 1995
    B.A.
    magna cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1973
    Des Moines, Iowa, February 28, 1973

Stephanie Lynn Marett

Share Holder at Nyemaster Goode, P.C.
Not yet reviewed

700 Walnut St., Ste. 1300Des Moines, IA 50309U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Gregory A. Witke
Pro
Gregory A. Witke
5.0
1
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

515-561-5173
View Profile
Gregory R. Brown
Pro
Gregory R. Brown
5.0
2
Litigation lawyer
403-781-5997
View Profile
Andrew D. Hall
Pro
Andrew D. Hall
4.4
1
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

515-985-2707
View Profile
William W. Graham
Pro
William W. Graham
5.0
2
Litigation lawyer
515-850-5463
View Profile
Guy R. Cook
Pro
Guy R. Cook
4.7
8
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

515-612-1609
View Profile

Email Stephanie Lynn Marett

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions