×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Mr. William Glenn Beatty

Not yet reviewed

33 W Monroe St Ste 2700, Chicago, IL 60603-5404

Employment Law, Product Liability, Insurance and 7 more

About Mr. William Glenn Beatty

Mr. William Glenn Beatty is a lawyer practicing employment law, product liability, insurance and 7 other areas of law. William received a degree from University of Oxford, and has been licensed for 48 years. William practices in Chicago, IL.

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. William Glenn Beatty got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for William

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labor and Employment 1
    • Employment Law
  • Products Liability 1
    • Product Liability
  • Insurance
  • Employee Benefits
  • Civil Rights 1
    • Human and Civil Rights
  • Health Care 1
    • Health Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Litigation
  • Nursing Home Litigation
  • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

Practice Details

  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Cases: District Court Decisions: Laurent v. Time Ins. Co. 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66423
    66424 (C.D. Ill. 2012) (dismissal with prejudice for client).
    Weller v. Time Ins. Co. 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42210 (D. Minn. 2009) (summary judgment for client).
    Jarrett v. Fortis Ins. Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1574 (C.D. Ill. 2008) (summary judgment for client).
    Caplinger v. Time Ins. Co., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49611 (S.D. Ill. 2007) (summary judgment for client).
    Zamarioni v. Fortis Ins. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41126 (S.D. Ill. 2006) (summary judgment for client).

    Published Opinions: Buckley Dement, Inc. v. The Travelers Plan Administrators of Illinois, Inc., 39 F.3d 784 (7th Cir. 1994).
    Klosterman v. Western General Management, Inc., 32 F.3d 1119 (7th Cir., 1994).
    Vershaw v. Northwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co., 979 F.2d 557 (7th Cir., 1992).
    Rizzo v. Travelers Ins. Co., 193 Ill. App.3d 67, 549 N.E.2d 810 (1st Dist., 1989).
    Balmes v. Hiab-Foco, A.B., 105 Ill.App.3d 572, N.E.2d 482 (1st Dist. 1982).
    Diomar v. L
    mark Associates, 81 Ill.App.3d 1135, 401 N.E.2d 1287 (1st Dist. 1980)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1990, Colorado Supreme Court
    1978, Illinois Supreme Court
    1990, Arizona Supreme Court
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
    United States Supreme Court
    United States Court of Claims
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas
    U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
    U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
    U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota
    U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
    2008, Indiana
    1990, Arizona
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Chicago - Kent College of Law
    Class of 1978
    J.D.
    with honors
    Other Education
    University of Oxford
    Dept. for Continuing Ed.

    University of Oxford
    Bioethics

    University of Oxford
    History of Medicine

    Augustana College
    Class of 1975
    B.A.m cum laude

    Insurance Law

    2011 - Present

    Queen Mary School of Law

    University College and

    University of London

    Medical Law and Ethics

    2011 - Present

    Creighton University School of Law
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1953
    Moline, Illinois, July 13, 1953

Mr. William Glenn Beatty

Not yet reviewed

33 W Monroe St Ste 2700Chicago, IL 60603-5404U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Michael Leonard
Pro
Michael Leonard
5.0
2
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

224-561-3123
View Profile
Paul Wilson Daugherity
Pro
Paul Wilson Daugherity
5.0
5
Labor and Employment lawyer
872-270-8523
View Profile
Robert Richard Duda, Jr.
Pro
Robert Richard Duda, Jr.
5.0
9
Labor and Employment lawyer
872-336-0724
View Profile
Stephen I. Lane
Pro
Stephen I. Lane
5.0
11
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

312-428-6320
View Profile
Ruth I. Major
Pro
Ruth I. Major
4.8
10
Labor and Employment lawyer
224-452-4336
View Profile

Email Mr. William Glenn Beatty

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions