×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Stephen Richard Ayres
Pro

Stephen Richard Ayres

4.4
1 review

2 N. Riverside Plaza, Suite 1725, Chicago, IL 60606

Insurance Defense, Construction and Toxic Torts

About Stephen Richard Ayres

Stephen Richard Ayres practices at Gunty, McCarthy & Moore LLC

Read Full Bio

Stephen Richard Ayres (Chicago, Illinois) View website

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Stephen Richard Ayres got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Stephen

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Insurance Defense
  • Toxic Torts
  • Other 1
    • Construction

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Associate
    Firm Name
    Gunty, McCarthy & Moore LLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Cases: Swann & Weiskopf v. Meed Associates Persuaded Illinois Appellate Court, First District, to affirm trial court's summary judgment dismissing claim against engineering firm which had designed storm water retention system, as being untimely under Illinois Construction Statute of Limitations.
    County of DuPage v. Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum 1996 WL 33413358 (Ill. App. 1996) Represented general contractor in the highly publicized sick building case involving the new DuPage County Courthouse, with a defense verdict following a month long jury trial, which was upheld on appeal.
    Capitol Indemnity v. Elston Self Service Wholesale Groceries (7th Cir. 2009) Persuaded 7th Circuit to affirm summary judgment for insured-client holding that alleged sale of counterfeit cigarettes falls within advertising injury coverage
    not excluded by prior acts exclusion in policy.
    Great American Insurance Co. v. Helwig 419 F.Supp. 2d 1017 (N.D. Ill. 2005) Obtained summary judgment for insured for underground pollution of well water despite absolute pollution exclusion by arguing that that exclusion was not part of the personal injury or advertising coverage of the insured's policy.
    Sycamore Industrial Park Ass' n v. Ericsson No. 08-1118 (7th Cir. 2008) Persuaded 7th Circuit to uphold summary judgment for seller of industrial park alleged to be liable under CERCLA
    RCRA for asbestos in the buildings.
    Farfan v. Commonwealth Edison No. 1-10-0502 (Ill. App. 2011) Obtained summary judgment for utility in electrocution death case which was upheld on appeal in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District.
  • Additional Links
    http://www.heylroyster.com/attorneys/details.cfm?pageID=4&attorneyID=145

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1984, Illinois
    United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    United States Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Professional Associations

    •Builders Association of Chicago/Association of General Contractors
    •Illinois State Bar Association
    •Chicago Bar Association
    •Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel
    •Defense Research Institute

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Illinois College of Law
    Class of 1984
    J.D.
    Other Education
    De Pauw University
    Class of 1981
    B.A.
    cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1959
    Hinsdale, Illinois, February 6, 1959

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Email Stephen Richard Ayres

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What is this attorney's primary practice area?
    The practice area Stephen Richard Ayres spends the most time on is Insurance Defense.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Stephen Richard Ayres is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and United States Supreme Court.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Stephen Richard Ayres has a 4.4 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Gunty, McCarthy & Moore LLC has 14 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Stephen Richard Ayres attended University of Illinois College of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions