|
|
Address
8 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 2700
Chicago, Illinois 60603 (Cook Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Available for representation in all Illinois Counties. Statement of PracticeMedical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Truck Accidents, Toxic Torts, Products Liability, Legal Malpractice, Railroad Accidents, Civil Rights, Employment Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Sexual Abuse, Wrongful Termination, Lead Poisoning. Firm Size: 1
Edmund J. Scanlan (Member) born Chicago, Illinois, October 15, 1949; admitted to bar, 1976, Illinois; 1977, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, including Trial Bar. Education: University of Notre Dame (A.B., 1971); DePaul University (J.D., 1975). Lecturer: Product Liability, Jan. 9, 1993; Dram Shop Act, ITLA seminars, June 4, 1988; Evidence Seminar, May 7, 1994. Television Talk Show Host, "Law Talk," Chicago Cable Access, 1993. Member: Chicago (Member, Civil Litigation Committee, 1991-1994) and Illinois State (Member, Civil Litigation Committee, 1990-1995) Bar Associations; Trial Lawyers for Public Justice; Illinois Trial Lawyers Association (Member, Board of Advocates, 1993); The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; West Suburban Bar Association. Reported Cases: Hollembaek v. Dominick's, 137 Ill.App.3d 773, 484 N.E.2d 1237 (1985); Cairns v. Hansen 170 Ill.App.3d 505, 524 N.E.2d 939 (1988); Briante v. Link, 184 Ill.App.3d 812 (1989); Masotti v. Console, 195 Ill.App.3d 838, 552 N.E.2d 1292 (1990); Kwasniewski v. Schaid, 153 Ill.2d 550, 607 N.E.2d 214 (1992); Spencer v. Wandolowski, 264 Ill.App.3d 611, 636 N.E.2d 854 (1994); Klem v. Mann, 279 Ill.App.3d 735, 665 N.E. 2d 514 (1996); Ward v. Mid-American Energy Company 313 Ill. App. 3d 258, 729 N.E. 2d 861 (2000). Practice Areas: Personal Injury Law; Medical Malpractice; Products Liability; Civil Rights; Employment Discrimination; Sexual Harassment; Wrongful Termination; Lead Poisoning; Commercial Litigation.Email: Edmund J. Scanlan
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|