×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Gregory Donald Conforti

Gregory Donald Conforti

Not yet reviewed

33 West Monroe Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60603-5404

Complex / Catastrophic, Retail, Nursing Home Litigation and 2 more

About Gregory Donald Conforti

Gregory Donald Conforti is a lawyer practicing complex / catastrophic, retail, nursing home litigation and 2 other areas of law. Gregory received a B.A. degree from Coe College in 1985, and has been licensed for 38 years. Gregory practices at Johnson & Bell, Ltd. in Chicago, IL.

Gregory Donald Conforti (Chicago, Illinois)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Gregory Donald Conforti got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Gregory

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury 1
    • Nursing Home Litigation
  • Transportation
  • Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Complex / Catastrophic
    • Retail

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Johnson & Bell, Ltd.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Cases: Conforti Receives Not Guilty Verdict in Trucking Accident
    Fern
    o Corral, Jr. Personal Representative of the Estate of Fern
    o Corral, Sr., deceased, v. Mervis Industries, Inc., a corporation
    Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2007 U.S. Dist. Lexis 9782 (N.D. Ill., Feb. 9, 2008).
    Hoa Nguyen v. F. L. Smithe Machine Company, Inc., 2000 U.S. Dist. Lexis 9857 (N.D. Ill. 2000).
    Robert Suzik
    Roxanne Suzik v. Sea-L
    Corporation, Sea L
    Services, Incorporated,
    CSX Corporation, 89 F. 3d 345 (7 Circuit 1996).
    John Flynn
    Carolyn Flynn v. Allis Chalmers Corporation, 262 Ill. App. 3d 136 (2 Dist 1994).
    Estelle Cohn v. The Northern Trust Company, 250 Ill. App. 3d 222 (1 Dist 1993)
    Myriam Diehl v. Heinz Company
    Metromail Corporation, 901 F.2d 73 (7 Circuit 1990).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1988, Illinois
    1988, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    1990, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    1994, Federal Trial Bar
    2004, U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois
    2005, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana
    2006, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois
    Memberships

    Affiliations

    •Illinois State Bar Association

    •ALFA Transportation Practice Group, chairman emeritus, chair, vice chair, program chair

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Wake Forest University
    Class of 1988
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Coe College
    Class of 1985
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1963
    Aurora, Illinois, August 9, 1963

Gregory Donald Conforti

Share Holder at Johnson & Bell, Ltd.
Not yet reviewed

33 West Monroe Street, Suite 2700Chicago, IL 60603-5404U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Edmund P. Boland
Pro
Edmund P. Boland
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer
312-675-8296
View Profile
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
Pro
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
5.0
69
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

312-535-4941
View Profile
David Rapoport
Pro
David Rapoport
5.0
1
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

224-801-5578
View Profile
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
Pro
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
5.0
69
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

312-535-4941
View Profile
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
Pro
Andrew Stephen Kryder, Esq.
5.0
69
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

312-535-4941
View Profile

Email Gregory Donald Conforti

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions