|
|
Address
53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1352
Chicago, Illinois 60604-3787 (Cook Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Accepts Credit Cards (Main Office) Representing innovative clients in patent applications, prosecution, opinions and litigation. Statement of PracticePatents, Patent Law, Opinions, Litigation, Appellate Practice, Intellectual Property. Firm Size: 5
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Accepts Major Credit Cards
Address53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1352
Chicago, IL 60604-3787, (Cook Co.)
PhonePhone: 312-201-0011
Fax: 312-201-0022
Website
http://www.beemlaw.com
Office HoursMonday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Tuesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Wednesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Thursday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Friday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Richard P. Beem (Principal) born Chicago, Illinois; admitted to bar, 1985, Texas; 1986, District of Columbia; 1987, Illinois; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois including Trial Bar; U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal and Seventh Circuits; U.S. Supreme Court; registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Education: Iowa State University (B.S. Ch.E., 1979); University of Houston (J.D., cum laude, 1985); DePaul University College of Law (Certificate in Mediation; 2001). Order of the Coif. Editor, Houston Law Review, 1984-1985. Law Clerk to Hon. Edward S. Smith, Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 1985-1987. Member, Industrial Advisory Council, College of Engineering, Iowa State University, 2000. Member: Chicago (Chair: Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights Committee, 1997-1998) and American (Co-chair, IPL Committee on Amicus Curiae Briefs, 2002-2004; Co-chair, IPL Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee, 2004-2005; Chair, IPL Individuals and Small Business Committee, 2005) Bar Associations; Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago (Secretary, 1992-1994); International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (Secretary, AIPPI-US Executive Committee, 2006). Practice Areas: Intellectual Property; Patents; Patent Law; Patent Litigation; Patent Prosecution.Email: Richard P. Beem
——————————John R Linzer (Associate) born Chicago, Illinois; admitted to bar, 2004, Illinois, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Education: University of Notre Dame (B.S., Mechanical Engineering, cum laude, 2001); University of Notre Dame Law School (J.D., cum laude, 2004). Pi Tau Sigma Mechanical Engineering Society. Moot Court Appellate. Member: American Intellectual Property Law Association; American Bar Association; Chicago Bar Association. Practice Areas: Intellectual Property; Patents; Patent Applications; Patent Litigation; Patent Prosecution; Patent Infringement.Email: John R Linzer
Allison M. Williams (Associate) born Skokie, Illinois; admitted to bar, 2005, Illinois; 2006, Missouri; registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Education: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (B.S., General Engineering, 2001); Michigan State University College of Law (J.D., cum laude, 2005). Member: Illinois State and American Bar Association. Practice Areas: Patent Prosecution; Patent Litigation; Patent Infringement; Patent Applications; International Patents.Email: Allison M. Williams
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|