×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Mr. John F. Allgood

Not yet reviewed

1275 Peachtree Street N East, Atlanta, GA 30309

Labor Relations, Unfair Competition, Dispute Resolution and 1 more

About Mr. John F. Allgood

Mr. John F. Allgood is a lawyer practicing labor relations, unfair competition, dispute resolution and 1 other area of law. John received a B.B.A. degree from Georgia State University in 1968, and has been licensed for 53 years. John practices in Atlanta, GA.

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. John F. Allgood got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for John

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Unfair Competition
  • Other 3
    • Labor Relations
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Lawsuits & Disputes

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1973, Georgia
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
    U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
    1973, Georgia State Court
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •State Bar of Georgia
    •Atlanta Bar Association - Dispute Resolution Section
    •College of Commercial Arbitrators
    •Georgia Arbitrators' Forum
    •College of Commercial Arbitrators -

    Bar Fellowship
    Fellow: Fellow: Fellow: Fellow: Fellow: Fellow: Fellow: Fellow: Fellow:

    Publications

    Apparent Authority Requirements of Attorney Not Met to Permit Enforcement of Mediation Settlement Agreement
    DR Currents
    May 20, 2013

    Legal Alert: Eighth Circuit Requires Arbitration of FLSA Claim and Rejects Board Decision in D.R. Horton
    January 15, 2013

    Case Watch for Arbitrators: Contract to Arbitrate Can Be Stuck as Sanction for Discovery Abuses
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    January 3, 2013

    Case Watch for Arbitrators: $5 Million Award Vacated Over Arbitrator's Failure to Disclose Conflicts
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News November 26, 2012

    Case Watch: For Arbitrators - 'Manifest Disregard' Still Alive as a Basis for Challenging Awards
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    August 2, 2012

    Dispute Resolution News
    Atlanta Bar Association - Dispute Resolution Section
    August 1, 2012

    CaseWatch Special: Immunity of Health Care Peer Review Panels Upheld
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    July 6, 2012

    Case Watch: For Arbitrators - Arbitrator Can Interpret Contract Text to Allow Class Actions, Court Says
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    May 30, 2012

    Case Watch for Arbitrators: Be Specific When Asking for a 'Reasoned Award'
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    April 20, 2012

    Legal Alert: Court Grants Partial Summary Judgment in Favor of Hospitals in Nurse Wage-Fixing Lawsuit
    March 28, 2012

    Case Watch for Arbitrators: Supreme Court Overrules West Virginia on FAA Preemption
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    March 19, 2012

    Legal Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Decision on FAA Preemption Overrules West Virginia High Court
    February 22, 2012

    Case Watch for Arbitrators: Mandatory Arbitration Agreements and Class Actions: The Latest Word, from the NLRB
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    February 16, 2012

    Legal Alert: Unilateral Right to Amend Arbitration Agreement Makes Employment Arbitration Clause Unenforceable
    February 7, 2012

    Legal Alert: SEC Rule Proposes to Preclude Certain Collective Action Claims under FINRA Arbitration Rules
    January 11, 2012

    Legal Alert: Class Action Preclusion and the NLRB
    January 9, 2012

    Dispute Resolution News
    Atlanta Bar Association Dispute Resolution Section
    January 1, 2012

    Case Watch: For Arbitrators - Awards Confirmation Deadlines Not Tolled by Clarification Requests
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    December 23, 2011

    Arbitration and Equitable Estoppel
    DR Currents (a publication of the Dispute Resolution Section of the State Bar of Georgia)
    December 1, 2011

    Case Watch: For Arbitrators - Disclose Repeat Customers to Avoid Accusations of Bias
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    October 12, 2011

    Case Watch: For Arbitrators - Georgia Arbitrators Can Write Awards that Will Withstand Challenge in Court
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    September 15, 2011

    Dispute Resolution News
    Atlanta Bar Association Dispute Resolution Section
    September 1, 2011

    Case Watch for Arbitrators: Failure-to-Disclose Challenges to Arbitration Awards
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    August 1, 2011

    Recent Spreng Decision Highlights Federal Policy Favoring Arbitration
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution News
    July 11, 2011

    Legal Alert: Supreme Court Finds FAA Preempts State Law Prohibiting Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
    May 3, 2011

    Supreme Court Finds FAA Preempts State Law Prohibiting Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements
    Lexology
    May 3, 2011

    Case Watch: The Impact of Concepcion on Georgia Arbitrators
    Georgia Commission of Dispute Resolution News
    May 1, 2011

    Case Watch for Arbitrators: The Feds v. The States: Whose Arbitration Policy Wins?
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution
    April 1, 2011

    Legal Alert: Second Circuit Addresses Class-Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements after Supreme Court's Stolt-Nielsen Decision
    March 18, 2011

    Second Circuit Addresses Class-Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements After Supreme Court's Stolt-Nielsen Decision
    Lexology
    March 18, 2011

    Recent Developments in Georgia ADR Law
    State Bar of Georgia - Dispute Resolution Section
    January 24, 2011

    Will the Arbitration Fairness Act Survive the Midterm Election?
    Georgia Commission on Dispute Resolution
    December 1, 2010

    Legal Alert: Supreme Court Holds that FAA Overrides Conflicting State Law Jurisdictional Provision
    February 22, 2008

    Legal Alert: NLRB Finds Mandatory Arbitration Agreement Illegal
    July 18, 2006

    Presentations

    Georgia Bar Dispute Resolution Section CLE
    August 9, 2013

    7th Annual Arbitration Institute - Atlanta, GA
    August 9, 2013

    Advanced Employment Law Seminar, Atlanta Bar Association - Atlanta, GA
    March 15, 2013

    6th Annual Arbitration Institute - Atlanta, Georgia
    August 10, 2012

    State Bar 5th Annual Arbitration Institute - Atlanta, Georgia
    August 19, 2011

    "Ethical Issues for Mediators and Mediation" Atlanta Bar Association Dispute Resolution Section Breakfast Meeting
    January 5, 2011

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Georgia School of Law
    Class of 1973
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Georgia State University
    Class of 1968
    B.B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1946
    Atlanta, Georgia, May 1, 1946

Mr. John F. Allgood

Of Counsel
Not yet reviewed

1275 Peachtree Street N EastAtlanta, GA 30309U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Joyce Gist Lewis
Pro
Joyce Gist Lewis
4.8
11
Labor and Employment lawyer
404-436-6721
View Profile
Roopchand
Pro
Roopchand "Bobby" Devadoss
4.0
4
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

888-926-1905
View Profile
Kenneth A. David
Pro
Kenneth A. David
4.6
2
Labor and Employment lawyer
470-826-0121
View Profile
Douglas P. Krevolin
Pro
Douglas P. Krevolin
4.8
12
Labor and Employment lawyer
470-847-5422
View Profile
Halsey G. Knapp, Jr.
Pro
Halsey G. Knapp, Jr.
5.0
2
Labor and Employment lawyer
404-436-6721
View Profile

Email Mr. John F. Allgood

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions