|
|
Address
Two Midtown Plaza
1349 West Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1150
Atlanta, Georgia 30309 (DeKalb & Fulton Cos.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeBusiness Litigation, Creditors Rights, Commercial Bankruptcy and Technology Law. Firm Size: 1
AddressTwo Midtown Plaza
1349 West Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1150
Atlanta, GA 30309, (DeKalb & Fulton Cos.)
PhonePhone: 404-966-5133
Facsimile: 404-806-2525
Call Firm Now 
Website
http://www.jcm-law.com
James C. Morton (Member) born Niagara Falls, New York, March 4, 1952; admitted to bar, 1979, Georgia. Education: State University of New York (B.S., 1975; J.D., cum laude, 1979). Law Clerk to the Honorable Newell Edenfield, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, 1979-1981. Formerly: Associate, 1981-1986 and Partner, 1987-1994, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore; Partner, Buker, Jones, Morton & Haley, P.C., 1995-2000. Member: Atlanta (Member, Sections on: Bankruptcy Law; Litigation) and American (Member, Business Law Section) Bar Associations; State Bar of Georgia (Member, Sections on: Bankruptcy; General Practice; Trial); Lawyers Club of Atlanta. Reported Cases: Acrotube, Inc. v. J.K. Financial Group, Inc., 653 F. Supp. 470 (N.D. Ga. 1987); In Re: Club Candlewood Associates, L.P., 106 B.R. 752 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1989); In Re: Brandon Mill Farms, Ltd., 37 B.R. 190 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1984); CM3, Inc. v. Associated Realty Investors/Prado, 201 Ga. App. 428, 411 S.E. 2d 320 (1991); Promenade Assoc., Ltd. v. Finish Line, Inc., 194 Ga. App. 741, 391 S.E.2d 714 (1990); Patellis et al. v. 100 Galleria Parkway Associates et al., 447 S.E.2d 113, 214 Ga. App. 154; Sun v. Langston, 316 S.E.2d 172, 170 Ga. App. 60; Rasmussen v. Nodvin, 329 S.E.2d 541, 174 Ga. App. 203; Carr v. Nodvin, 342 S.E.2d 698, 176 Ga. App. 228. Practice Areas: Business Litigation; Business Bankruptcy; Technology Law; Creditors Rights.Email: James C. Morton
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|