|
|
Address
4400 Peachtree Road, N.E
Atlanta, Georgia 30319 (DeKalb & Fulton Cos.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation (Main Office) David S. Bills is an aggressive trial lawyer committed to the highest standards of professionalism, ethics and service. In practice for more than 23 years, Mr. Bills has ably represented clients in a broad range of civil trial and appellate matters. Mr. Bills enjoys an excellent reputation and is frequently associated by other lawyers on significant client matters. As a sole practitioner, Mr. Bills maintains a limited caseload to ensure that proper attention and resources are devoted to each client matter, and frequently utilizes alternative dispute resolution to appropriately avoid or shorten unnecessary litigation. Statement of PracticeCivil Litigation and Appellate Practice, Catastrophic Injury, Wrongful Death, Legal Malpractice, Legal Ethics, Medical Malpractice, Hospital Liability, Nursing Home Liability, Roadway Construction Defects, Engineering Malpractice, Trucking and Automobile Accidents, and Premises Liability. Firm Size: 1
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Free Initial Consultation
Address4400 Peachtree Road, N.E
Atlanta, GA 30319, (DeKalb & Fulton Cos.)
PhonePhone: 404-240-0045
Facsimile: 404-240-0047
Website
http://www.davidsbills.com
David S. Bills (Member) born Chattanooga, Tennessee, May 19, 1958; admitted to bar, 1983, Georgia, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth and Eleventh Circuits and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia; 1985, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia. Education: Berry College (B.A., cum laude, 1980); Emory University (J.D., 1983). Member: State Bar of Georgia; America Association of Justice (Sustaining Member); Georgia Trial Lawyers Association (Champion Member; Chair, Membership Review Committee; CLE Speaker); Southern Trial Lawyers Association. Reported Cases: Taylor v. Ledbetter, 818 F.2d 791 (11th Cir. 1987) (en banc), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1065, 109 S.Ct. 1337, 103 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989); Smith v. Finch, Ga. (Case No. S08G1845; Decided 6/29/2009); McDowell v.Smith, Ga. (Case No. S08G1967; Decided 6/29/2009); Abelson v. Atlanta Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.A., 195 Ga.App. 274, 392 S.E.2d 916 (1990), rev'd, 260 Ga. 711, 398 S.E.2d 557 (1990); Menendez v. Perishable Distributors, Inc., 744 F.2d 1551 (11th Cir. 1984), on certified question, 254 Ga. 306, 329 S.E.2d 149 (1985) (per curiam), after remand, 763 F.2d 1374 (11th Cir. 1985); Newmann v. United States, 938 F.2d 1258 (11th Cir. 1991); Rogers v. Evans, 792 F.2d 1052 (11th Cir. 1986); Williams v. Georgia Department of Human Resources, 789 F. 2d 881 (11th Cir. 1986); Hummell v. Gainesville Radiology Group, P.C., 205 Ga.App. 157, 421 S.E.2d 333 (1992), rev'd, 263 Ga. 91, 428 S.E. 2d 786 (1993); Whalen v. Moone, 242 Ga.App. 795, 531 S.E.2d 727 (2000); Hendon v. DeKalb County, 203 Ga.App. 750, 417 S.E.2d 705 (1992), cert. denied; Jimenez v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc. 238 Ga.App. 638, 519 S.E. 2d 722 (1999); Horton v. Allstate Insurance Co., 171 Ga.App. 707, 320 S.E.2d 761 (1984); Menendez v. Jewett, 196 Ga.App. 565, 396 S.E.2d 294 (1990); Hospital Authority of Fulton County v. Litterilla, 199 Ga.App. 345, 404 S.E.2d 796 (1991), aff'd, 262, Ga. 34, 413 S.E.2d 718 (1992) (Amicus Curiae); Brandvain v. Ridgeview Institute, Inc., 188 Ga.App. 106, 372 S.E.2d 265 (1988), aff'd, 259 Ga. 376, 382 S.E.2d 597 (1989) (per curiam) (Amicus Curiae); Etkind v. Suarez, 271 Ga. 352, 519 S.E.2d 210 (1999) (Amicus Curiae); Rose v. Hamilton Medical Center, Inc., 184 Ga.App. 182, 361 S.E. 2d 1 (1987) (Amicus Curiae); Martin v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 253 Ga. 337, 320 S.E.2d 174 (1984) (Amicus Curiae). Practice Areas: Civil Litigation; Appellate Practice; Catastrophic Injury; Wrongful Death; Legal Malpractice; Legal Ethics; Medical Malpractice; Hospital Liability; Nursing Home Liability; Engineering Malpractice; Trucking; Automobile Accidents; Premises Liability.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|