|
|
Address
18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218
Miami, Florida 33160 (Miami-Dade Co.)
Phone
305-931-2200; 800-686-9921
Average Client Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
Average Peer Review Rating
Rating not available
(Main Office) Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. is a boutique law firm with a national and international reputation for successfully handling childhood sexual abuse case. The Firm is committed to providing the highest quality of legal services. Statement of PracticeChild Sexual Abuse, Litigation and Trial Practice. Firm Size: 3
Address18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218
Miami, FL 33160, (Miami-Dade Co.)
PhonePhone: 305-931-2200; 800-686-9921
Fax: 305-931-0877
Website
http://www.sexabuseattorney.com
Stuart S. Mermelstein (Member) born New York, N.Y., October 14, 1960; admitted to bar, 1987, New York and U.S. District Court, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York; 1988, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; 1989, Pennsylvania; 1992, Florida and U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; 1996, U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania; 2000, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 2003, U.S. Court of Federal Claims; 2006, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida. Education: University of Miami (B.B.A., summa cum laude, 1981); State University of New York at Buffalo (J.D., magna cum laude, 1986). Executive Editor: Buffalo Law Review, 1985-1986. Member: The Florida Bar; American Bar Associations. Practice Areas: Child Sexual Abuse Litigation.Email: Stuart S. Mermelstein
Adam D. Horowitz (Member) born Long Beach, New York, December 27, 1974; admitted to bar, 2000, Florida and U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; 2001, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida; 2001, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit; 2004, U.S. Tax Court; 2005, U.S. Court of Federal Claims; 2006, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado; 2009, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Education: University of Miami (B.A., cum laude, 1996; J.D., cum laude, 2000). Articles Editor, University of Miami Law Review, 1999-2000. Moot Court Board, 1998-2000. Author: "Nelson v. McClatchy Newspapers: What Happens When Freedom of the Press Collides With Free Speech?", 54 University of Miami Law Review 359 (2000); "The Constitutionality of the Children's Internet Protection Act," 13 St. Thomas University Law Review 425 (2000). Reported Cases: Malicki v. Doe, 814 So.2d 347 (Fla. 2002); Jarzynka v. St. Thomas University, 310 F.Supp.2d 1256 (S.D. Fla. 2004); Cherry v. Catholic Charities, 815 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Jarzynka v. St. Thomas University, 323 F.Supp.2d 660 (W.D. Pa. 2004); Lloredo v. RadioShack Corporation, 2005 WL 1156030 (S.D. Fla. May 12, 2005); Nielsen v. Archdiocese of Denver, 413 F.Supp.2d 1181 (D.Col. 2006); Elk v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 405 (2006); Doe v. Karl G. Faerber, et al., 446 F.Supp.2d 1311 (M.D.Fla. 2006); Doe v. Florida Intern. University Bd. of Trustees, 464 F.Supp.2d 1259 (S.D. Fla. 2006); Doe No. 2 v. Kolko, 242 F.R.D. 193 (E.D.N.Y. 2006); Kopalchik v. Diocese of Richmond, 645 S.E.2d 439 (Va. 2007); Succar Succar v. Safra National Bank of New York, 237 Fed.Appx. 526 (11th Cir. 2007); Joseph v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 2008 WL 282163 (D.S.D. 2008); Elk v. United States, 87 Fed. Cl. 70 (2009). Practice Areas: Sexual Abuse; Employment Litigation; Education Law.Email: Adam D. Horowitz
Ratings Methodology
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|