×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Mr. Evan Scott Kagan

4.2
5 reviews

1629 K Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC

Drug and Medical Device Litigation, Toxic Torts, Asbestos Litigation and 11 more

About Mr. Evan Scott Kagan

Mr. Evan Scott Kagan is a lawyer practicing drug and medical device litigation, toxic torts, asbestos litigation and 11 other areas of law. Evan received a B.A. degree from Bucknell University in 2001, and has been licensed for 20 years. Evan practices in Washington, DC.

Awards

Silver Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 3 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.0 or higher.
Champion Badge Silver

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Mr. Evan Scott Kagan got this award in 2021

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Evan

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.2
See All Reviews
5
Showing 1-5 of 5 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
80%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
20%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
4.2
Quality of Service
4.2
Responsiveness
4.2
Value for Money
4.2
Torts
Posted by anonymous
December 15, 2018
Hired Attorney

Evan was very insightful, and took time to explain my situation to me in a way that was understandable, and constructive. Would recommend to anyone in need of an attorney.

Litigation
Posted by anonymous
December 12, 2018
Hired Attorney

Evan Kagan went above and beyond in regards to my case and, his duties that were provided to me and was very professional, assertive, and always available anytime I reached out. Via email, text, phone call, appointment, etc.

Medical Malpractice
Posted by anonymous
December 12, 2018
Hired Attorney

excellent professional, attentive at all times about my case, he took the trouble to even explain the steps of the process. no doubt i would contract him again.

Medical Malpractice
Posted by anonymous
December 11, 2018
Hired Attorney

As a long time client of Evan Kagan. I am entirely, shocked after seeing the review about Evan over seven years ago. During the tim Mr. Kagan, has been representing he has gone above and beyond in all aspects of the legal process in relation to Consumer Law case. Along, the same lines, I'm sincerely confused in regards, to the review from September, 2011 because, this review does not reflect any of the Work that Mr. Kagan has done for me.Keep up the great work.

 
Consumer Law
Posted by anonymous
September 19, 2011
Hired Attorney

He charged me over $1,000 and never did anything to get my money back that I know of. The only time he personally contacted me was when he took my money. After that, I was contacted once by one of his colleges because I made a complaint with the Florida Bar. So he said he would do something but I received none of my $13,000 I was scammed out of or get my money back from him.

 

Services

Areas of Law

  • Products Liability 1
    • Drug and Medical Device Litigation
  • Toxic Torts 1
    • Asbestos Litigation
  • Mesothelioma
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Personal Injury 2
    • Automobile Accidents
    • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Immigration
  • Real Estate
  • Other 3
    • Truck Accidents
    • Business
    • Corporate & Incorporation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Managing Partner

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, Florida
    2009, District of Columbia
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Nova Southeastern Shepard Broad Law Center
    Class of 2005
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Bucknell University
    Class of 2001
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1978
    Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, August 23, 1978

Mr. Evan Scott Kagan

Managing Partner
4.2
5 reviews

1629 K Street NW, Suite 300Washington, DC U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Thomas C. Cardaro
Pro
Thomas C. Cardaro
4.9
5
Drug and Medical Device Litigation lawyer
410-864-4698
View Profile
Richard S. Frankowski
Pro
Richard S. Frankowski
5.0
34
Drug and Medical Device Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

659-204-2682
View Profile
Julie Teresa Oliver-Zhang
Pro
Julie Teresa Oliver-Zhang
4.8
46
Drug and Medical Device Litigation lawyer
771-218-3541
View Profile
Wiliam P. Lightfoot, Jr.
Pro
Wiliam P. Lightfoot, Jr.
5.0
8
Drug and Medical Device Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

771-240-4544
View Profile

Email Mr. Evan Scott Kagan

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions