×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
David J. Federbush

David J. Federbush

5.0
1 review

4977 Battery Lane, Suite 913, Bethesda, MD 20814 + 1 location

Consumer Law, Contracts, Fraud and Deceit and 5 more

About David J. Federbush

David J. Federbush is a lawyer practicing consumer law, contracts, fraud and deceit and 5 other areas of law. David J. received a B.A. degree from Yale University, and has been licensed for 49 years. David J. practices at David J. Federbush, Esq. in Bethesda, MD and 1 other location.

David J. Federbush (Bethesda, Maryland)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for David J.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
1
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Debtor and Creditor
Posted by anonymous
December 13, 2012
Hired Attorney

Attorney Mr. David Federbush is a very capable lawyer. He knows the laws and what he is doing. He also spends time with the clients and works for them diligently. He knows what to do to win the cases. A very good attorney.

Services

Areas of Law

  • Consumer Law
  • Contracts
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury 1
    • Negligence
  • Civil Rights 1
    • Discrimination
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 2
    • Antitrust
    • Deceptive Trade Practices
  • Other 1
    • Fraud and Deceit

Practice Details

  • Languages
    French
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    David J. Federbush, Esq.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    In re Subpoena Duces Tecum To Testify Before Gr
    Jury, 633 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1980) (FTC appearing as amicus curiae in support of TRW)
    Matter of Gr
    Jury Empanelled Aug. 14, 1979, 638 F.2d 1235 (3rd Cir. 1981) (FTC appearing as amicus curiae in support of TRW)
    In the Matter of Trans Union Credit Information Company, 102 F.T.C. 1109 (1983)
    FTC v. Alaska L
    Leasing, Inc., et al., 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14727 (C.D. Cal. 1984)
    In the Matter of Charles E. Weller, 104 F.T.C 1089 (1984)
    FTC v. U.S. Oil & Gas Corp., et al., 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16137 (S.D. Fla. 1987)
    Receiver for FBA, Inc. v. FB Air, Inc., 995 F.2d 378 (2d Cir. 1993)
    Lewis v. AT&T, 78 F.3d 599 (11th Cir. 1996)
    Vesta Fire Insurance Corporation, et al. v. Florida Dept. of Insurance, et al., 141 F.3d 1427 (11th Cir. 1998)
    Penberthy v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. 354 F.Supp. 2nd 1323 (M.D. Fla. 2005)
    Farzam v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, 2012 WL 5873676 (D.D.C. 2012).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1977, District of Columbia
    1988, Florida
    1992, Maryland
    1988, U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia
    1988, U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida
    1994, U.S. District Court District of Maryland
    2004, U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida
    2012, U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    1980, U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit
    1988, U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit
    1989, U.S. Court of Appeals 11th Circuit
    1993, U.S. Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit
    1998, U.S. Court of Appeals 4th Circuit
    1988, U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships
    American Bar Association (Member, Sections on: Litigation and Antitrust Law)
    District of Columbia Bar (Member, Litigation Section)
    Florida Bar (Former Member and Chairman, Florida Bar Journal Editorial Board)
    Member, Litigation Section)
    Maryland State Bar Association (Member, Litigation Section).
    Bar Fellowship
    Selected as a contributing author to the American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section's 2013 Review of Consumer Protection Law Developments and 2016 Second Edition of Consumer Protection Law Developments.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Stanford Law School
    J.D.
    California Court of Appeal

    Stanford Law School
    J.D.
    Honors: Law Clerk to Judge Winslow Christian
    Other Education
    Yale University
    B.A.
    summa cum laude

    Yale University
    B.A.
    Psychology
  • Special Agencies
    Special Counsel (antitrust), Zumpano, Patricios & Winker, P.A., Coral Gables, FL.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1949
    Brooklyn, New York, April 4, 1949
    Hobbies & Interests
    Tennis, travel, reading.

Email David J. Federbush

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions