×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Richard William Riley

Not yet reviewed

Duane Morris Llp, Wilmington, DE 19801

Bankruptcy Litigation, Civil Litigation, Commercial Litigation and 2 more

About Richard William Riley

Richard William Riley is a lawyer practicing bankruptcy litigation, civil litigation, commercial litigation and 2 other areas of law. Richard received a B.B.A. degree from University of Notre Dame in 1984, and has been licensed for 38 years. Richard practices in Wilmington, DE.

Reviews for Richard

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 3
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Business Reorganization
    • Bankruptcy Law

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Debtors' Counsel: In re Archway Cookies, LLC, et al.
    In re Rehrig International Incorporated, et al.
    In re Sleep Innovations, et al.
    Creditors' Committee Counsel: In re Fluid Routing Solutions, et al.
    In re Orleans Homebuilders, Inc., et al.
    In re Trico Steel Company, LLC, et al.
    Agent or Secured Lending Group Counsel: In re Friendly Ice Cream Corporation, et al.
    In re Perkins & Marie Callender's Inc., et al.
    In re Harry & David Holdings, Inc., et al.
    In re American Safety Razor, LLC, et al.
    Greatwide Logistics Services, LLC, et al.
    Leiner Health Products, Inc., et al.
    New Vision Television, LLC, et al.
    Majestic Star Casinos, Inc., et al.
    In re Nellson Nutraceutical, Inc., et al.
    ANDA Litigation: Genzyme Corporation, et al. v. S
    oz Inc., et al., Case No. 09-285 (GMS) (D. Del.) (Consolidated).
    Astrazeneca AB v. Wockhardt USA, LLC, et al.
    GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al., v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA
    Forest Laboratories v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA, et al.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, New Jersey
    1988, Pennsylvania
    2001, Delaware
    U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
    1988, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    1989, Supreme Court of New Jersey
    U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
    Supreme Court of Delaware
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Villanova University School of Law
    Class of 1988
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Notre Dame
    Class of 1984
    B.B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1962
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, January 15, 1962

Email Richard William Riley

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions