×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

George Brencher, IV (P.C.)

Not yet reviewed

1 Unknown, New Haven, CT 06511

Company Formation, Seed and Venture Capital Financing, Mergers & Acquisitions and 6 more

About George Brencher, IV (P.C.)

George Brencher, IV (P.C.) is a lawyer practicing company formation, seed and venture capital financing, mergers & acquisitions and 6 other areas of law. George received a B.A. degree from University of Pennsylvania in 1988, and has been licensed for 34 years. George practices in New Haven, CT.

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

George Brencher, IV (P.C.) got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for George

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 9
    • Company Formation
    • Seed and Venture Capital Financing
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Private Equity Financing
    • Emerging Companies
    • Securities Matters
    • Strategic Transactions
    • Technology Licensing
    • Executive Employment

Practice Details

  • Languages
    French
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Representation of a software developer in a strategic transaction with Comcast.
    Representation of TheStreet.com in the sale of several divisions.
    Representation of family office clients in numerous growth capital financings.
    The acquisition of luxury br
    s in the home
    gift category.
    Representation of a large Independent Sales Organization (ISO) in private equity financings
    general company matters.
    Representation of a software developer in a strategic licensing transaction with PepsiCo, Inc.
    Sales of wireless licenses to AT&T
    Sprint with individual transaction values in excess of 100 million.
    Representation of founders
    executives in employment matters, financings
    exit.
    Representation of start-ups from inception in numerous industries including software, adtech, fintech, ticketing, SaaS, wearable computing, biotechnology
    medical devices.
    Representation of Bluefin Payment Systems, a provider of electronic payment security solutions from inception.
    Representation of specialty lenders, including SG Credit Partners, in capital raising, lending transactions
    other matters.
    Represented Meta Company, a pioneer in developing augmented reality technology from inception.
    Represented PatronManager, LLC in connection with a strategic majority investment by Providence Strategic Growth.
    Represented Patron Technology, Inc., an event technology provider, in numerous acquisitions.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1992, Connecticut
    1992, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
    1996, New York
    Memberships

    Activities and Associations

    •American Bar Association, Member
    •New York Bar Association, Member

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    University of Pennsylvania
    Class of 1988
    B.A.
    J.D. magna cum laude

    University of Pennsylvania
    Class of 1992
    J.D. magna cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1966
    Hartford, Connecticut, July 28, 1966
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions