×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Galen Driscoll Bellamy

Galen Driscoll Bellamy

Not yet reviewed

370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4500, Denver, CO 80202

Product Liability, Commercial Litigation, Appellate and 5 more

About Galen Driscoll Bellamy

Galen Driscoll Bellamy is a lawyer practicing product liability, commercial litigation, appellate and 5 other areas of law. Galen received a degree from Order of the Coif, and has been licensed for 2016 years. Galen practices at Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP in Denver, CO.

Galen Driscoll Bellamy (Denver, Colorado)

Reviews for Galen

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Products Liability 1
    • Product Liability
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Appellate Practice 1
    • Appellate
  • Class Actions
  • Investments 1
    • Financial Services
  • Construction Law 1
    • Construction & Engineering
  • Other 2
    • Investigations & Compliance
    • Consumer Products & Services

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Cases: Galen Bellamy represents major manufacturers in consumer class action
    product liability litigation. His clients include sophisticated companies such as Whirlpool
    Toyota.
    Won a multimillion-dollar arbitration award for an energy company, recovering more than 15 times the last settlement offer made before trial.
    Glazer v. Whirlpool (N.D. Ohio 2014) - Won a complete defense jury verdict for Whirlpool in a $66 million certified class action trial in Ohio involving allegedly moldy washing machines.
    Tietsworth v. Sears (N.D. Cal. 2013) - Defeated a motion to certify a nationwide breach of warranty class in a case alleging that certain Kenmore washing machines contained defective electronic control boards that caused the machines to malfunction.
    Savett v. Whirlpool (N.D. Ohio 2012) - Secured dismissal with prejudice of a putative nationwide class action complaint alleging that certain Whirlpool washing machines were mislabeled with the Energy Star logo.
    Tietsworth v. Sears, Roebuck
    Co.
    Whirlpool Corp. (N.D. Cal. May 4, 2012) - Won denial of certification of a putative nationwide class action complaint alleging that certain Whirlpool washing machines contained defective electronic control boards that caused the machines to malfunction
    could potentially cause them to explode.
    Munch v. Sears, Roebuck
    Co. (N.D. Ill. Sept. 30, 2008) - Dismissal of putative state consumer protection claims alleging that Sears failed to disclose that certain Whirlpool-manufactured washing machines contained defective electronic control boards
    a design defect that caused them to develop moldy odors.
    Represented large multinational consumer goods manufacturer
    large retailer in multiple class actions regarding allegedly defective products.
    Represented large healthcare
    medical supply company in one of the largest securities class actions in U.S. history.
    Conducted internal investigations of international private equity firm
    large semiconductor manufacturer.
    Represented large multinational document services company
    large accounting firm in connection with investigations by the U.S. Securities
    Exchange Commission regarding alleged accounting irregularities.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2000, Colorado
    2004, California
    2001, District of Columbia
    11, US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit
    US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
    US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
    US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit
    US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit
    10, US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit
    US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit
    US District Court for the Central District of California
    US District Court for the District of Colorado
    US District Court for the Eastern District of California
    US District Court for the Northern District of California
    US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
    US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
    US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
    US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
    US Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Legal Memberships, Activities, and Honors
    Colorado Rising Stars
    Class Action/Mass Torts, 2010-2013
    Business Litigation, 2009

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Florida - Levin College of Law
    Class of 1999
    J.D.
    with high honors
    Other Education
    Order of the Coif

    Florida Law Review, Board Member

    University of Florida
    B.A.
    Major in English

    Minor in Philosophy, with honors, 1996
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1973
    Manhasset, New York, 1973

Galen Driscoll Bellamy

Partner at Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP
Not yet reviewed

370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4500Denver, CO 80202U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Keith R. Olivera
Pro
Keith R. Olivera
4.5
1
Products Liability lawyer
720-437-7892
View Profile
Adam J. Goldstein
Pro
Adam J. Goldstein
4.8
1
Products Liability lawyer
720-507-2083
View Profile
Murray Ogborn
Pro
Murray Ogborn
5.0
1
Products Liability lawyer
720-953-1484
View Profile
Nikolas M. Sulley
Pro
Nikolas M. Sulley
5.0
1
Products Liability lawyer

Free Consultation

720-881-9731
View Profile
Michael J. Daugherty
Pro
Michael J. Daugherty
5.0
1
Products Liability lawyer
983-203-7305
View Profile

Email Galen Driscoll Bellamy

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions