|
|
Address
274 Union Boulevard, Suite 220
Lakewood, Colorado 80228-1835 (Jefferson Co.)
Website
http://www.bc-law.com
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Accepts Credit Cards (Main Office) The firm of Benezra & Culver, L.L.C. has achieved the highest rating for legal ability and ethics in Martindale-Hubbell. Statement of PracticeLitigation and Appellate Practice with emphasis in all aspects of Employment Law, Class Actions, Wrongful Discharge, Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Americans with Disabilities Act, False Claims Act, Fair Labor Standards Act, Constitutional Law, Federal False Claims Act Litigation, Criminal Defense, Employment Mediation and Arbitration. Year Established: 1994
Firm Size: 2
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Accepts Major Credit Cards - Visa
- MasterCard
- American Express
- Discover
Address274 Union Boulevard, Suite 220
Lakewood, CO 80228-1835, (Jefferson Co.)
PhonePhone: 303-716-0254
Fax: 303-716-0327
Websitehttp://www.bc-law.com
Office HoursMonday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Tuesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Wednesday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Thursday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Friday: 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
Seth J. Benezra (Member) born Oakland, California; admitted to bar, 1983, Colorado; 1986, U.S. Supreme Court; 1990, California; 1991, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1992, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado and U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Education: Stanford University (B.A., with distinction, 1980); University of Colorado (J.D., 1983). Articles Editor, University of Colorado Law Review, 1982-1983. Lecturer, Employment Law, University of Denver College of Law, 1997. Member: Boulder County Bar Association (President, 2002-2003), Denver and Colorado Bar Associations (Member, Board of Governors, 2004). Reported Cases: JURY VERDICTS: Caspar v. Lucent Technologies, et al., Ca No. 01-WM-2240 (D. Colo. 2003) (Total judgment in excess of $1.6 million, including $900,000 in back- and front-pay and $300,000 in punitive damages); Langley v. Adams County, 987 F.2d 143 (10th Cir. 1993) (Plaintiff awarded in excess of $1 million in lost wages, compensatory damages, attorney fees and costs). Languages: Spanish. Practice Areas: Employment Law; Whistleblower Litigation; Sexual Harassment; Civil Rights; Criminal Defense.
John A. Culver (Member) born Salt Lake City, Utah; admitted to bar, 1992, Colorado, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado and U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Education: Kansas University (B.A., with honors, 1987); University of Pennsylvania (J.D., 1992). Author, "Expanded Accommodations for Religious Minorities under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act," Trial Talk, September, 1996. Co-editor: Practitioners Guide to Colorado Employment Law. Adjunct Professor, University of Denver College of Law, 1997. Vice-President, Colorado Plaintiff's Employment Lawyer's Association, 2000-2001. Member, Legal Panel, American Civil Liberties Union, 1996-1998. Reported Cases: JURY VERDICTS: Caspar v. Lucent Technologies, et al., Ca. No. 01-WM-2240 (D. Colo. 2003) (Total judgment in excess of $1.6 million, including $900,000 in back- and front-pay and $300,000 in punitive damages); Drake v. TalMor, et al., Ca. No. 01-CV-211 (Boulder, 2002) (Roughly $3.5 million judgment for fraud and breach of employment contract). Practice Areas: Class Actions; Constitutional Law; Employment Law; Civil Rights; Executive Compensation; Public Employees; Attorney Fee Litigation; Criminal Law.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|