|
|
Address
1333 2nd Street
Suite 500
Santa Monica, California 90401 (Los Angeles Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticePatents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Domain Names, Trade Secrets, Unfair Competition, Intellectual Property Licensing, Patent Litigation, Trademark Litigation, Copyright Litigation. Year Established: 1979
Firm Size: 30
Daniel M. Cislo (Managing Partner) born Chicago, Illinois, June 10, 1959; admitted to bar, 1986, California, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; U.S. Supreme Court; 2006, District of Columbia; registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Education: University of California at Los Angeles (B.S., Systems Engineering, 1981); Loyola Marymount University (J.D., 1986). Recipient, American Jurisprudence Awards in Entertainment Law and Lawyering Skills. Practice Areas: Patents; Trademarks; Copyrights; Intellectual Property Licensing; Patent Litigation; Trademark Litigation; Copyright Litigation; Domain Name Infringement; Trade Secrets; Unfair Competition.Email: Daniel M. Cislo
Donald M. Cislo (Senior Partner Emeritus) born Chicago, Illinois, January 21, 1935; admitted to bar, 1964, Illinois; 1971, California; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Ninth Circuit; U.S. District Court, Central District of California; registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Education: Illinois Institute of Technology (B.S., 1957); DePaul University (J.D., 1964).. Pro Bono Small Claims and Traffic Court Judge. Practice Areas: Trade Secrets; Unfair Competition; Patents; Trademarks; Copyrights; Intellectual Property Licensing; Patent Litigation; Trademark Litigation; Copyright Litigation; Domain Name Infringement.Email: Donald M. Cislo
Charles H. Thomas (Senior Partner Emeritus) born 1942; admitted to bar, 1970, Illinois and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois; registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; 1976, California and U.S. District Court, Central District of California; U.S. Claims Court; 1978, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and Tenth Circuit; 1994, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of Illinois (B.S., 1963); DePaul University (J.D., 1970). Languages: Spanish. Practice Areas: Trade Secrets; Unfair Competition; Patents; Trademarks; Copyrights; Intellectual Property Licensing; Patent Litigation; Trademark Litigation; Copyright Litigation; Domain Names.Email: Charles H. Thomas
ASSOCIATEKelly W. Cunningham (Associate) born Lafayette, Indiana, October 11, 1965; admitted to bar, 1996, California, U.S. District Court, Central District of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1998, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Education: University of California at Los Angeles (B.S., Materials Engineering, 1989; J.D., 1995). Member: State Bar of California (Member, Sections on: Intellectual Property; Antitrust); Los Angeles Intellectual Property Association; American Intellectual Property Law Association; Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association. Practice Areas: Patents; Trademarks; Copyrights; Trade Secrets; Unfair Competition; Intellectual Property Licensing; Domain Name Infringement.Email: Kelly W. Cunningham
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|