|
|
Address
501 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 610
Santa Monica, California 90401 (Los Angeles Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
Rating not available
(Main Office) Representation in Immigration Court (Removal Proceedings) and the Board of Immigration Appeals. Statement of PracticeImmigration, Family Visas, Intra-Company Transfers, Asylum, Investors' Visas, Religious Visas, J Visas, Appellate Practice, Abused Alien Spouses of US Citizens, Naturalization and Citizenship. Year Established: 2000
Firm Size: 1
Languages: Russian, German, Polish, French and Hebrew.
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Address501 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 610
Santa Monica, CA 90401, (Los Angeles Co.)
PhonePhone: 310-395-8000
Fax: 310-395-0152
Call Firm Now 
Website
http://www.reismanlawoffice.com
Office HoursMonday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Tuesday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Wednesday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Thursday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Friday: 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Edward S. Reisman (Member) admitted to bar, 1991, Maryland; 1993, District of Columbia, U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit; 1998, California; 2001, U.S. District Court, Central District of California; 2003, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 2004, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of Rochester (B.A., History and Russian, cum laude, with High Distinction in History, 1976); University of Chicago (M.A., History, 1980; Ph.D., History, 1987); Georgetown University Law Center (J.D., 1991). Author: "Federal 'Export Trading Company' Program Removes Many Anti-Trust Hurdles for American Exporters," Bulletin of the Eastern Baltimore Area Chamber of Commerce, October 1992; "The Absence of a Common Descent Myth for Russia," Russian History, 1988; "The Cult of Boris and Gleb," Russian Review, 1978. Attorney/Consultant, HIAS/Council Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2000. Assistant District Counsel, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los Angeles, California, 1996-1999. Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Attorney, 1992-1996 and Attorney-Advisor, Honors Program, 1991-1993, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D.C. Attorney-Advisor, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 1992. Attorney-Advisor and Law Clerk, 1990 and 1991-1992, Office of the Chief Counsel for International Commerce. Member: Los Angeles County Bar Association; State Bar of California; District of Columbia Bar; Maryland State Bar Association; American Immigration Lawyers Association. Special Agencies: U.S. Department of Homeland Security; U.S. Department of State; U.S. Department of Labor; U.S. Department of Justice/Executive Office for Immigration Review (including Immigration Courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals). Reported Cases: In re J-P, Board of Immigration Appeals Interim Decision No.3348; In the Matter of: Live Swine from Canada, NAFTA Secretariat No. USA-94-1904-01 (May 30, 1995), Department aff'd on remand (September 27, 1995); In the Matter of: Color Picture Tubes from Canada, NAFTA Secretariat No. USA-95-1904-03 (May 6, 1996); Saarstahl AG v. United States, 78 F.3d 1539 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Mitsubishi Electronic Industries (Canada) v. Brown, Secretary of Commerce, 917 F.Supp. 836 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996); UCF America Inc. v. United States, 919 F.Supp. 435 (Ct. Int-l Trade 1996); National Steel Corporation et al. v. United States, 870 F.Supp. 1130 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994), remanded, 913 F.Supp. 593 (1996), Department aff'd on reremand, 929 F.Supp. 1577 (1996); Manifattura Emmepi v. United States, 17 CIT 1033 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1993). Languages: Russian (spoken), German (spoken), Polish (read), French (read), Latin (read), Greek (read), Hebrew (read). Practice Areas: Asylum; Immigration and Naturalization; Appellate Practice; Visas.
This firm or lawyer does not have ratings information available. To read more about Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review and Peer Review Ratings™, click here.
Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should notbe construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell® accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|