|
|
Address
1026 Palm Street, Suite 214
San Luis Obispo, California 93401 (San Luis Obispo Co.)
Phone
805-540-7100; 805-534-1000
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
 Free Initial Consultation  Accepts Credit Cards (Main Office) Statement of PracticeGeneral Trial and Appellate Practice. Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice and Wrongful Death, Criminal (including Mental Health Issues), Indian Law, Driving While Intoxicated, Juvenile, Parole and Probation, Traffic Violations, Automobile Accidents, Dog Bites, Sexual Abuse, Slip and Fall, Nursing Home Abuse, Airplane Crashes, Discrimination, Qui Tam Litigation and Real Estate Law. Year Established: 1992
Firm Size: 1
Representative Clients:Washington State Democratic Party
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians
Quileute Indian Tribe
Pilchuck Audubon Society
Huckleberry Mountain Protection Society
Heights Water Association
Humane Farming Association
Vashon-Maury Island Community Council.
Rate InformationFixed Hourly Rates
Fixed Fees Available
Free Initial Consultation
Accepts Major Credit Cards - Visa
- MasterCard
- American Express
Address1026 Palm Street, Suite 214
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, (San Luis Obispo Co.)
PhonePhone: 805-540-7100; 805-534-1000
Fax: 805-540-7101
URL: http://www.lawyers.com/vogel
Website
http://www.davidvogel.com
Firm/Affiliate OfficesSeattle, Washington Office: 1700 Seventh Avenue, Suite 2100, 98101. Telephone: 206-622-2573.
David S. Vogel (Member) born New York, N.Y., July 11, 1955; admitted to bar, 1983, Washington and U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington; 1984, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1990, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington; 1999, U.S. Supreme Court; 2008, California. Education: Amherst College (A.B., 1977); Boston University (J.D., magna cum laude, 1982). Listed, Who's Who in American Law. Editor, Boston University Law Review, 1980-1982. Law Clerk to the Hon. Frank M. Johnson, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, 1982-1983. Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, King County, 1984-1989. Chair, 30th District Democrats, 1986-1988. President, 1986-1993 and Board Member, 1985-2000, Vashon-Maury Island Community Council. Co-Chair, Vashon Town Plan Committee, 1992-1997. Board Member: Vashon Household, 1996-2005; The Harbor School, 2006-2008. Member: State Bar of California; Seattle-King County (Member, Judicial Screening Committee, 2005-2008), Washington State and American Bar Associations; Association of Trial Lawyers of America; Washington State Trial Lawyers Association (Member, Legislative Steering Committee, 2006); Brain Injury Association; Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Reported Cases: Midwater Trawlers Coop. v. DOC, 282 F.3d 710 (9th Cir. 2002); Pilchuck Audubon Society v. U.S. Forest Service, 177 F.3d 800 (9th Cir. 1999); State v. D.V., 139 Wn.2d 320, 987 P.2d 63 (1999); State v. Buchanan, 87 Wn. App. 189, 941 P.2d 683 (1997), rev'd 138 Wn.2d 186, 978 P.2d 1070 (1999); cert. denied; Credit Gen. Ins. Co. v. Blondo, 82 Wn. App. 620, 919 P.2d 93 (1996); Winfrey v. Rocket Research Co., 58 Wn. App. 722, 794 P.2d 1300 (1990). Practice Areas: General Trial and Appellate Practice; Personal Injury; Medical Malpractice; Wrongful Death; Indian Law; Driving While Intoxicated; Juvenile; Parole and Probation; Traffic Violations; Automobile Accidents; Dog Bites; Sexual Abuse; Slip and Fall; Nursing Home Abuse; Airplane Crashes; Discrimination; Qui Tam Litigation.
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|