|
|
Address
110 West C Street, Suite 1014
San Diego, California 92101 (San Diego Co.)
Average Client Review Rating
Rating not available
Average Peer Review Rating
5.0
out of 5
(Main Office) Statement of PracticeCivil Rights, Discrimination, Employment, Sexual Harassment, Employment Contracts, Wrongful Termination, General Practice, Starting a Business, Legal Ethics, Professional Responsibility, Legal Malpractice, Expert Witness, Attorney's Fees. Firm Size: 1
James E. King (Member) born New York, New York, September 2, 1954; admitted to bar, 1979, California and U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; 1980, U.S. District Court, Northern and Central Districts of California; 1982, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1985, U.S. Supreme Court. Education: University of Georgia (A.B., summa cum laude, 1976); Stanford University Law School (J.D., 1979). Order of the Coif; Phi Beta Kappa. Member, 1977-1978 and Editor, 1978-1979, Stanford Law Review. Law Clerk to Judge Howard Turrentine, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, 1979-1980. San Diego County Bar Association Award for Legal Education, 1995. Chairman: San Diego County Bar Week, 1994; San Diego County Continuing Legal Education Committee, 1989-1994. Member: State Bar of California. Practice Areas: Professional Conduct; Litigation; Appellate Practice; Employment Law; Civil Rights; Discrimination; Sexual Harassment; Employment Contracts; Wrongful Termination; General Practice; Business Start-Ups; Legal Ethics; Legal Malpractice; Attorney Fee Disputes.Email: James E. King
Ratings Methodology
The following firm members have been rated by their peersDisclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
|